Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. Salesforce.com, Inc.

Filing 156

ORDER granting ECF No. 155 Stipulation. Plaintiff to submit the reply claim construction brief by May 4, 2021. Defendant to submit the sur-reply claim construction brief by May 18, 2021. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/23/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Michael A. Burke, Esq. (NSB #11527)
ROBISON, SHARP, SULLIVAN & BRUST
71 Washington St.
Reno, NV 89503
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Andrea Pacelli, Esq. (pro hac vice)
Mark S. Raskin, Esq. (pro hac vice)
Michael DeVincenzo, Esq. (pro hac vice)
Elizabeth Long, Esq. (pro hac vice)
Eric Berger, Esq. (pro hac vice)
KING & WOOD MALLESONS LLP
500 Fifth Ave., 50th Floor
New York, New York 10110
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Steven C. Sereboff, Esq. (pro hac vice)
SoCAL IP LAW GROUP LLP
1332 Anacapa, Suite 201
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

John Frankovich, NV Bar #667
Leigh Goddard, NV Bar #6315
MCDONALD CARANO LLP
100 West Liberty Street, 10th Floor
P.O. Box 2670
Reno, NV 89505-2670
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Kevin Johnson (pro hac vice)
Ray Zado (pro hac vice)
Sam Stake (pro hac vice)
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant salesforce.com, inc.

Attorneys for Plaintiff Applications in Internet
Time, LLC

20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

21

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

22

Applications in Internet Time, LLC,

23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 3:13-CV-00628-RCJ-CLB

Plaintiff,
v.
Salesforce.com, Inc.
Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME TO FILE CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION BRIEFS (ECF No. 155)
(First Request)

1

Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record,

2

hereby stipulate and request that this Court extend the deadlines for Plaintiff Applications in Internet

3

Time, LLC (“AIT”) and Defendant salesforce.com, inc. (“Salesforce”) to file their Reply and Sur-

4

Reply Claim Construction Briefs, respectively, by one week, as follows:

5

Event

6

Plaintiff to submit reply claim construction brief April 27, 2021
(20 pages) in accordance with Local Patent Rule 116 (as modified by the Court)
Defendant to submit sur-reply claim construction May 4, 2021
brief (20 pages) in accordance with Local Patent
Rule 1-16 (as modified by the Court)

7
8
9

Current Deadline

New Deadline
May 4, 2021
May 18, 2021

10

This is the first stipulation for extension of time to file claim construction briefs.

11

Reasons for Request for Extension: The parties agree that additional time is warranted to

12

ensure that the issues are adequately presented to the Court. The parties have made certain

13

adjustments to their proposed claim constructions and the additional time will allow the parties to

14

fully address these new arguments. The parties do not believe the additional time will impair the

15

Court’s decision as the Markman hearing is currently not expected to take place prior to the end

16

of June, 2021.
ORDER

17
18

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the case shall proceed on the foregoing schedule.

19

IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of April, 2021.

20
21
22

____________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28
2