Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. Salesforce.com, Inc.

Filing 291

ORDER granting ECF No. 284 Stipulation. Response due by 10/28/2022 and Replies due by 11/18/2022 as to ECF No. 281 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/11/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJS)

Case 3:13-cv-00628-RCJ-CLB Document 291 Filed 10/11/22 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

21

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

22
23

Applications in Internet Time, LLC,
Plaintiff,

24

v.

25

Salesforce, Inc.

26
27
28

Defendant.

Case No. 3:13-CV-00628-RCJ-CLB
ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE
DEADLINES TO SALESFORCE’S
MOTION TO DISMISS DKT. 281
(First Request)

Case 3:13-cv-00628-RCJ-CLB Document 291 Filed 10/11/22 Page 2 of 3

1

Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record,

2

hereby stipulate and request that this Court extend the deadlines for Plaintiff Applications in Internet

3

Time, LLC (“AIT”) and Defendant Salesforce, Inc. (“Salesforce”) to file their Response and Reply

4

Briefs to Salesforce’s Motion to Dismiss Dkt. 281, respectively, as follows:

5

Event

6

Plaintiff to submit responsive brief to Salesforce’s October 14, 2022
Motion to Dismiss Dkt. 281
Salesforce to submit reply brief in support of its October 21, 2022
Motion to Dismiss Dkt. 281

7
8
9

Current Deadline

New Deadline
October 28, 2021
November 18, 2022

This is the first stipulation for extension of time.

10

Reasons for Request for Extension: The parties will be concurrently briefing summary

11

judgment motions and Daubert motions. The parties agree that additional time is warranted to ensure

12

that the issues addressed are adequately presented to the Court.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

Case 3:13-cv-00628-RCJ-CLB Document 291 Filed 10/11/22 Page 3 of 3

1
2

DATED: October 6, 2022

DATED: October 6, 2022

By: /s/ Andrea Pacelli_______
Michael A. Burke (NSB #11527)
ROBISON, SHARP, SULLIVAN &
BRUST

By: /s/ Ray Zado___________
John Frankovich, NV Bar #667
Leigh Goddard, NV Bar #6315
Philip Manelly, NV Bar #14236
McDonald Carano LLP

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Andrea Pacelli (pro hac vice)
Mark S. Raskin (pro hac vice)
Michael DeVincenzo (pro hac vice)
Charles Wizenfeld (pro hac vice)
Daniel Miller (pro hac vice)
KING & WOOD MALLESONS LLP
Steven C. Sereboff (pro hac vice)
SoCAL IP LAW GROUP LLP

Kevin Johnson (pro hac vice)
Ray Zado (pro hac vice)
Sam Stake (pro hac vice)
James Judah (pro hac vice)
Attorneys for Defendant Salesforce, Inc.

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Applications in Internet Time, LLC

14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED:
DATED: October 11, 2022

17
18
19

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3