Almy v. Bannister et al
Filing
226
ORDER DISMISSING CASE With Prejudice on ECF No. 225 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/17/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
Case 3:13-cv-00645-MMD-VPC Document 225 Filed 10/17/16 Page 1 of 2
1
2
ADAM PAUL LAXALT
Nevada Attorney General
HEATHER B. ZANA
Deputy Attorney General
3
Nevada Bar No. 8734
4
Bureau of Litigation
Public Safety Division
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
100 N. Carson Street
Carson City, NV 89701-4717
Tel: (775)684-1261
E-mail: hzana@ag.nv.gov
Attorneysfor Defendants
Robert Bannister, James "Greg" Cox,
Eric Fancher, Sheryl Foster,
Edward Gibson, Brandt Hailing,
Tanya Hill, Wesley Mattice,
Veronica Meza, John Peery,
Gregory Smith, Rashonda Smith,
Sue Steward, Stephen Torsky,
Ruben Vidaurri, Margaret Whittington,
and Brian Williams, Sr.
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
15
16
17
KEVIN ALMY,
Case No. 3:13-cv-00645-MMD-VPC
18
Plaintiff,
19
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
vs.
20
R. BANNISTER, et al..
21
Defendants.
22
23
Plaintiff, appearing in proper person, and Defendants, Robert Bannister, James "Greg" Cox,
24
Eric Fancher, Sheryl Foster, Edward Gibson, Brandt Hailing, Tanya Hill, Wesley Mattice, Veronica
25
Meza, John Peery, Gregory Smith, Rashonda Smith, Sue Steward, Stephen Torsky, Ruben Vidaurri,
26
Margaret Whittington, and Brian Williams, Sr., by and through counsel, Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney
27
General of the State of Nevada, and Heather B. Zana, Deputy Attorney General, hereby stipulate and
28
Office of the
Attorney General
100 N. Carson St.
Carson City, NV
89701-4717
Case 3:13-cv-00645-MMD-VPC Document 225 Filed 10/17/16 Page 2 of 2
1
agree, pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41 (a)(2), that the above-captioned action should be dismissed with
2
prejudice by order of this Court, with each party to bear his or her own costs.
3
SO STIPULATED:
4
DATED this ^
DATED this / day ofOctober, 2016
day of October, 2016
ADA^^PAUL LAXALT
5
Attooi^Seneral
6
7
8
HEATHER. ZANA
Deputy iyforney General
Ic^FVTXT ALMY
KEVIN AT \ / r v
Plaintiff
AttorneyssjoVpefgridant
9
10
11
ORDER
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
This matter comes before the Court on the parties' Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice.
The Court has examined the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice as agreed by the parties
hereinabove, good cause having been shown,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed with prejudice with each
party bearing its own attorneys' fees and costs.
DATED this 17th day of
October
, 2016.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Office of the
Attorney General
100 N. Carson St.
Carson City, NV
89701-4717
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?