Castillo v. Legrand et al

Filing 66

ORDERED that respondents' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 54 ) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to conduct discovery (ECF No. 59 ) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents' first, second, and third motions for extension of time to file a reply in support of the motion to dismiss (ECF Nos. 61 , 62 , 63 ) are all DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall administratively close this case. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/31/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9

GERARDO CASTILLO,

10

Case No. 3:13-cv-00704-LRH-VPC
Petitioner, ORDER

v.
11
LEGRAND, et al.,
12
Respondents.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

This is petitioner Gerardo Castillo’s pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In light of the stipulation to stay proceedings,
IT IS ORDERED that respondents’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 54) is DENIED
without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for leave to conduct
discovery (ECF No. 59) is DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents first, second, and third motions for

21

extension of time to file a reply in support of the motion to dismiss (ECF Nos. 61, 62, 63)

22

are all DENIED as moot.

23

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall administratively close this case.

24
DATED this 31st day of January, 2018.
25
26
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27
28
1