Hazelwood v. Skolinik et al

Filing 11

ORDER directing Clerk to file the petition and motion for appointment of counsel; granting the motion for appointment of counsel; provisionally appointing the FPD to represent petitioner. The FPD shall have 30 days to undertake direct representation or indicate his inability to do so. If the FPD does undertake representation, he shall then have 60 days to file an amended petition. The Clerk shall add Catherine Cortez Masto as counsel for respondents and shall e-serve both the NV AG and FPD a copy of the petition and a copy of this order (NEFs sent 8/5/2014). Respondents' counsel shall enter a notice of appearance within 20 days but no further response is required from them until further court order. Any exhibits shall be filed with separate index. Hard copies of any exhibits shall be forwarded, for this case, to staff attorneys in Las Vegas. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/4/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 SHAQUILLE E. HAZELWOOD, 10 Petitioner, 11 vs. 12 HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al., 13 Case No. 3:14-cv-00022-LRH-WGC Respondents. ORDER 14 15 Petitioner has paid the filing fee. He has also submitted a motion for appointment of 16 counsel. Petitioner is unable to afford counsel, and the issues presented warrant the appointment of 17 counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). 18 19 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the clerk of the court file the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 20 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court file the motion for appointment of counsel. 22 23 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel is GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender is provisionally appointed to represent petitioner. 24 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Federal Public Defender shall have thirty (30) days 25 from the date that this order is entered to undertake direct representation of petitioner or to indicate 26 to the court his inability to represent petitioner in these proceedings. If the Federal Public Defender 27 does undertake representation of petitioner, he shall then have sixty (60) days to file an amended 28 /// 1 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. If the Federal Public Defender is unable to represent petitioner, 2 then the court shall appoint alternate counsel. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that neither the foregoing deadline nor any extension thereof 4 signifies or will signify any implied finding of a basis for tolling during the time period established. 5 Petitioner at all times remains responsible for calculating the running of the federal limitation period 6 and timely asserting claims. 7 8 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall add Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall electronically serve both the Attorney 10 General of the State of Nevada and the Federal Public Defender a copy of the petition and a copy of 11 this order. 12 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents’ counsel shall enter a notice of appearance 13 within twenty (20) days of entry of this order, but no further response shall be required from 14 respondents until further order of the court. 15 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any exhibits filed by the parties shall be filed with a 16 separate index of exhibits identifying the exhibits by number or letter. The CM/ECF attachments 17 that are filed further shall be identified by the number or numbers (or letter or letters) of the exhibits 18 in the attachment. The hard copy of any additional state court record exhibits shall be 19 forwarded—for this case—to the staff attorneys in Las Vegas. 20 DATED this 4th day of August, 2014. 21 22 _________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?