Sanzo v. Cox et al

Filing 22

ORDER granting 21 Motion for Clarification : Service was not accepted as to defendant Michael Fisher. As to those defendants for whom service was not accepted, plaintiff will have to serve those defendants in accordance with FRCP. Plaintif f's counsel will also have to clarify the identity of the defendant identified as "Correctional Officer Lee" before proceeding with service on this individual. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 8/21/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA MICHAEL TODD SANZO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) JAMES G. COX, et al., ) ) Defendants ) ________________________________________) 3:14-cv-00030-RCJ-WGC MINUTES OF THE COURT August 21, 2014 PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: Before the court is defendants' Motion for Clarification Based on Changed Circumstances. (Doc. # 21.) Filed contemporaneously with the motion was a Notice of Acceptance of Service where Defendants' counsel indicated service of plaintiff's amended complaint was accepted on behalf of defendants Colete Ball, Bruce Bannister, Giovanni Capra, James "Greg" Cox, Jon Garner, Dawn Jones and William Sevier. (Doc. # 20.) Counsel states that service was accepted under the Attorney General's arrangement with the District Court for pro se inmate ยง 1983 litigation and inquired whether that policy would continue as to the remaining defendants in this case for whom service was not accepted now that plaintiff is represented by counsel. Service was not accepted as to defendant Michael Fisher, who is no longer an employee of the Nevada Department of Corrections, for certain fictitiously named defendants or for an individual with the last name of "Lee," first name unknown. (Id). As to those defendants for whom service was not accepted, plaintiff will have to serve those defendants in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff's counsel will also have to clarify the identity of the defendant identified as "Correctional Officer Lee" before proceeding with service on this individual. IT IS SO ORDERED. LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK By: /s/ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?