Sanzo v. Cox et al

Filing 73

ORDER adopting and accepting 71 R&R; granting 57 Motion for Summary as to Defendants Cox and Bannister; denying 57 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendants Lee, Capra, and Ball; directing Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/5/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

4
5

MICHAEL TODD SANZO,

6

CASE NO.: 3:14-CV-00030-RCJ-WGC

Plaintiff,
ORDER

7

v.

8

JAMES G. COX, et al.,

9

Defendants.
_______________________________________

10
11

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge (#711) entered on

12

December 10, 2015, recommending that the Court grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment

13

(ECF #57) as to Defendants Cox and Dr. Bannister, and deny Defendant’s Motion for Summary

14

Judgment (ECF #57) as to Defendants Lee, Capra and Ball. Defendants filed a Partial Objection to

15

Report and Recommendation (ECF #72) on December 28, 2015.

16

The Court has conducted it’s de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of

17

the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant

18

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s

19

Report and Recommendation (#71) entered on December 10, 2015, should be ADOPTED AND

20

ACCEPTED.

21
22
23
24

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #57) is
GRANTED as to Defendants Cox and Dr. Bannister.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #57) is
DENIED as to Defendants Lee, Capra and Ball.

25

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED this 5TH day of January, 2016.

27

_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES

28

1

Refers to court’s docket number.