Wilson v. LeGrand et al

Filing 3

ORDER Application to proceed IFP 1 is denied. Filing fee due within 30 days. Clerk shall send petitioner two copies of this order (mailed 2/19/14). Petitioner shall make arrangements to have one copy attached to filing fee. Clerk shall file petition and accompanying motions. Motion for appointment of counsel is granted. FPD provisionally appointed as counsel and shall have 30 days to undertake representation or indicate inability to do so. Motion for leave to file longer t han normal petition is granted. Clerk shall add state AG as counsel for respondents. Respondents' counsel shall enter notice of appearance within 21 days. Hard copies of exhibits for this case shall be sent to the Clerk in Las Vegas. Clerk shall send copy of order to petitioner, Nevada AG, FPD, and CJA Coordinator (served via mail/NEF 2/19/14). Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/18/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 7 MICHAEL DUANE WILSON, Petitioner, 8 9 3:14-cv-00071-RCJ-VPC vs. ORDER 10 ROBERT LEGRAND, et al., 11 Respondents. 12 13 This habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 comes before the Court on petitioner’s 14 application (#1) to proceed in forma pauperis, motion (#1-5) for leave to file a longer than 15 normal petition, and motion (#1-6) for appointment of counsel, as well as for initial review. 16 On the pauper application, the Court finds, following review of the record of petitioner’s 17 recurring deposits and discretionary expenditures, that petitioner has the ability to pay the 18 $5.00 filing fee within a reasonable time. The application therefore will be denied. The 19 pauper application otherwise establishes petitioner’s financial eligibility for appointment of 20 counsel. 21 On the counsel motion, the Court finds that the appointment of counsel for the 22 financially eligible petitioner is in the interests of justice herein, given: (a) the lengthy sentence 23 structure, which includes multiple concurrent sentences of life with eligibility for parole; (b) the 24 number and complexity of the substantive and procedural issues potentially involved in the 25 case; and (c) the prospect that there potentially may be substantial time remaining in the 26 federal limitation period at the filing of the pro se original petition for federal habeas counsel 27 to develop and present claims. The Court therefore will provisionally appoint counsel subject 28 to payment of the filing fee. 1 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner’s application (#1) to proceed in forma 2 pauperis is DENIED. Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from entry of this order within 3 which to have the filing fee of five dollars ($5.00) sent to the Clerk of Court. The Clerk shall 4 SEND petitioner two copies of this order. Petitioner shall make the necessary arrangements 5 to have one copy of this order attached to the check paying the filing fee. Failure to timely 6 comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action without further advance notice. 7 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the Clerk shall file the petition and accompanying 8 motions. 9 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel is GRANTED 10 and that the Clerk shall note the grant of the motion by this order on the docket in a manner 11 consistent with the Clerk’s current practice. The counsel appointed will represent petitioner 12 in all proceedings related to this matter, including any appeals or certiorari proceedings, 13 unless allowed to withdraw. 14 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the Federal Public Defender shall be provisionally 15 appointed as counsel and shall have thirty (30) days to undertake direct representation of 16 petitioner or to indicate an inability to do so. If the Federal Public Defender is unable to 17 represent petitioner, the Court then shall appoint alternate counsel. A deadline for the filing 18 of an amended petition and/or seeking other appropriate relief will be set after counsel has 19 entered an appearance. The Court anticipates setting the deadline for approximately one 20 hundred twenty (120) days from entry of the formal order of appointment. No deadline 21 established herein or extension thereof will establish in and of itself a basis for tolling of the 22 federal limitation period. 23 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for leave to file a longer than 24 normal petition is GRANTED and that the Clerk shall note the grant of the motion by this order 25 on the docket in a manner consistent with the Clerk’s current practice.1 26 //// 27 1 28 Nothing in the grant of petitioner’s motions signifies tacit acceptance of all of petitioner’s arguments in support of the motions. Moreover, the filing of the original petition does not signify that the petition is free of deficiencies. The original pleading is being filed in anticipation of the filing of a counseled amended petition. -2- 1 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED, so that the respondents may be electronically served with 2 any papers filed through counsel, that the Clerk shall add the state attorney general as 3 counsel for respondents and shall make informal electronic service of this order upon 4 respondents by directing a notice of electronic filing to her. Respondents' counsel shall enter 5 a notice of appearance within twenty-one (21) days of entry of this order, but no further 6 response shall be required from respondents until further order of this Court. 7 Hard copies of exhibits for this case shall be sent to the Clerk in Las Vegas. 8 The Clerk accordingly shall SEND a copy of this order to the pro se petitioner, the 9 Nevada Attorney General, the Federal Public Defender, and the CJA Coordinator for this 10 Division and shall regenerate notices of electronic filing of all prior filings for both counsel. 11 DATED: February 18, 2014. 12 13 14 ___________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?