Myers v. Baker et al

Filing 33

ORDER - Counsel for petitioner must meet with petitioner as soon as reasonably possible as specified herein. Amended petition due by 1/26/2016. Answer/response to amended petition due 45 days after service; reply due 45 days thereafter. Any exhibi ts shall be filed with an index, and as specified herein. Courtesy paper copy of all exhibits shall be sent to Reno Staff Attorney. All future filings must be served on FPD's Office. Petitioner must not file further pro se documents and must proceed by and through appointed counsel. ( Copy mailed to P at ESP on 10/28/2015. ) Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/28/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 JOSHUA CARY MYERS, 10 11 12 13 Case No. 3:14-cv-00082-MMD-VPC Petitioner, ORDER v. RENEE BAKER, et al., Respondents. 14 This is a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 15 2254, by a Nevada state prisoner. On September 24, 2015, this Court granted 16 petitioner’s motion for counsel and appointed the Federal Public Defender to represent 17 petitioner in this action. (Dkt. no. 30.) On October 26, 2015, T. Kenneth Lee of the 18 Federal Public Defender’s Office appeared on behalf of petitioner. (Dkt. no. 32.) The 19 Court now sets a schedule for further proceedings in this action. 20 It is therefore ordered that counsel for petitioner must meet with petitioner as 21 soon as reasonably possible, if counsel has not already done so, to: (a) review the 22 procedures applicable in cases under 28 U.S.C. § 2254; (b) discuss and explore with 23 petitioner, as fully as possible, the potential grounds for habeas corpus relief in 24 petitioner’s case; and (c) advise petitioner that all possible grounds for habeas corpus 25 relief must be raised at this time in this action and that the failure to do so will likely 26 result in any omitted grounds being barred from future review. 27 It is further ordered that petitioner will have ninety (90) days from the date of 28 entry of this order, to file and serve on respondents an amended petition for writ of 1 habeas corpus, which must include all known grounds for relief (both exhausted and 2 unexhausted). 3 It is further ordered that respondents will have forty-five (45) days after service of 4 an amended petition within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, the amended 5 petition. If petitioner does not file an amended petition, respondents will have forty-five 6 (45) days from the date on which the amended petition is due within which to answer, or 7 otherwise respond to, petitioner’s original petition. 8 9 It is further ordered that if and when respondents file an answer, petitioner will have forty-five (45) days after service of the answer to file and serve a reply. 10 It is further ordered that all exhibits filed by the parties herein must be filed with 11 an index of exhibits identifying the exhibits by number. Exhibits filed in the CM/ECF 12 system must correspond to the numbered exhibits identified in the index of exhibits. 13 It is further ordered that the parties must send courtesy (paper) copies of all 14 exhibits to the Reno Division of this Court. Courtesy copies must be delivered to the 15 Clerk of Court, 400 S. Virginia St., Reno, NV, 89501, and directed to the attention of 16 “Staff Attorney” on the outside of the mailing address label. 17 It is further ordered that the all pleadings and court filings must be served on the 18 Federal Public Defender’s Office (FPD), at the address indicated on the FPD’s notice of 19 appearance. 20 21 22 It is further ordered that petitioner must not file further pro se documents and must proceed by and through appointed counsel. DATED THIS 28th day of October 2015. 23 24 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?