Williams v. City of Sparks et al
Filing
10
ORDER adopting and accepting 6 Report and Recommendation; granting 1 IFP application; directing Clerk to file the 1 -1 complaint; dismissing without prejudice Count II; dismissing without prejudice and with leave to amend Defendants City of Sparks, Sparks Police Department, and Sparks Police Chief. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/4/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
* **
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ROBERT L. WILLIAMS,
5
Plaintiff,
6
v.
7
SPARKS, CITY OF, et al.,
8
Defendants.
9
CASE NO.: 3:14-CV-00174-RCJ-VPC
ORDER
10
The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
11
(ECF #6) entered on June 25, 2014, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court grant
12
Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (#1) and file the Complaint (#1-1). Count I of
13
the Complaint will proceed in part and is dismissed in part with leave to amend, and Count II be
14
dismissed without prejudice. The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties
15
and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the
16
requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, and good cause appearing, the court hereby
17
ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Magistrate Judge (ECF #6),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (#1)
is GRANTED, the Clerk shall file the Complaint (#1-1).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Count II of Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED without
PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants City of Sparks, Sparks Police Department
and Sparks Police Chief are DISMISSED without PREJUDICE and with leave to amend.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of November, 2014.
26
_______________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?