Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al

Filing 5

ORDER - IFP Application and complaint demonstrating a basis for the USDC for the District of Nevada to exercise jurisdiction over the action due within fourteen days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 4/22/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

4
5

BILL LIETZKE,

6
7
8

3:14-cv-00177-RCJ-WGC
Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
CITY OF MONTGOMERY, et. al.,

9

Defendants.

10
11

This Order is issued as a supplement to the court's order of April 9, 2014, denying

12

Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice (Doc. # 3). Plaintiff is

13

advised that if he does not file a corrected application to proceed in forma pauperis along with a

14

complaint demonstrating a basis for the United States District Court for the District of Nevada to

15

exercise jurisdiction over the action within fourteen days of the date of this Order, it may

16

result in the issuance of an order dismissing this action without prejudice and administratively

17

closing the file in this district.

18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

DATED: April 22, 2014
_______________________________________
WILLIAM G. COBB
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE