Romano v. Legrande et al

Filing 34

ORDER - Claims specified herein are dismissed without prejudice for lack of exhaustion. Answer to remaining claims due by 12/30/2016. Reply due 45 days after service of answer. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/14/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 10 ROBERT ROMANO, Case No. 3:14-cv-00187-MMD-WGC Petitioner, ORDER v. 11 12 LeGRANDE, et al., Respondents. 13 14 15 Following upon petitioner’s declaration (ECF No. 33) of election to abandon claims 16 in this habeas matter, it is ordered that the following claims are dismissed without 17 prejudice for lack of exhaustion: 18 (a) the claims in Ground 1 based upon the Confrontation Clause and the 19 Equal Protection Clause and all claims in Ground 1 based on a denial 20 of notice of expert witness with regard to Officer Norris’ testimony; 21 (b) all claims in Ground 2 based upon the Equal Protection Clause; 22 (c) all remaining claims in Ground 6 over and above the claim dismissed as redundant; 23 24 (d) all claims in Ground 7 except for the claim that petitioner was denied 25 a right to due process when Inspector Sheldon allegedly testified as 26 an expert on the temperature of bodily fluids without prior notice; 27 28 (e) all remaining claims in Ground 8 over and above the claim dismissed as redundant; 1 (f) all claims in Ground 11 based upon the Equal Protection Clause; and 2 (g) Grounds 12, 13 and 15 in their entirety. 3 It further is ordered that respondents must file an answer to the remaining claims 4 in the petition, as amended, within forty-five (45) days of entry of this order. Petitioner 5 may file a reply within forty-five (45) days of service of the answer. 6 It further is ordered that, given the age of the case, any extensions of time sought 7 based on scheduling conflicts between this case and other cases in this Court should be 8 sought in the earlier-filed case, absent extraordinary circumstances. The Court will be 9 endeavoring to resolve this case, if possible, prior to September 30, 2017. 10 11 DATED THIS 14th day of November 2016. 12 13 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?