Romano v. Legrande et al

Filing 51

ORDER that Respondents must supplement the record with the transcripts described in order, or file a notice indicating where in this Court's record those transcripts may be located by 9/10/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/31/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 ROBERT ROMANO, 10 Petitioner, ORDER v. 11 12 Case No. 3:14-cv-00187-MMD-WGC RENEE BAKER, et al., Respondents. 13 14 This pro se habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 comes before the Court 15 for consideration on the merits. Following review, it appears that certain transcripts or 16 audio recordings that were a part of Petitioner’s trial have not been filed as part of the 17 state court record. Specifically, Respondents have not filed transcripts of the following: 18 (1) Petitioner’s interview with Detective Roberts; (2) J.R.’s interview with Investigator 19 Sheldon; and (3) J.R.’s interview with her mother, all of which were recorded on audio 20 tape and played for the jury. (See ECF Nos. 23-1, 24-1, 25-1 (Ex. 41 (Tr. 167-69); Ex. 42 21 (Tr. 91-92); (Ex. 43 (Tr. 31)).) The Court is in need of those materials to evaluate the 22 Petitioner’s claims. 23 It is therefore ordered that within ten (10) days of the date of entry of this order, 24 Respondents must supplement the record with the aforementioned transcripts, or file a 25 notice indicating where in this Court’s record those transcripts may be located. 26 /// 27 28 1 DATED THIS 31st day of August 2018. 2 3 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?