Rowley v. Colvin
Filing
19
ORDER adopting and accepting 17 Report and Recommendation; granting Plaintiff's 11 Motion for Remand; denying the Commissioner's 16 Cross-Motion to Affirm; remanding matter to ALJ for calculation and award of benefits; directing Clerk to enter judgment and close case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/18/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
5
DEBORAH ROWLEY,
6
CASE NO.: 3:14-CV-00196-RCJ-WGC
Plaintiff,
ORDER
7
8
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner
of Social Security, et al.,
9
10
Defendants.
_______________________________________
11
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge (#171) entered on
12
April 30, 2015, recommending that the Court grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand (ECF #11) and deny
13
the Commissioner’s Cross-Motion to Affirm (ECF #16). Defendant’s Objection to Magistrate Judge’s
14
Report and Recommendation (ECF #18) was filed on May 14, 2015.
15
The Court has conducted it’s de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of
16
the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant
17
to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s
18
Report and Recommendation (#17) entered on April 30, 2015, should be ADOPTED AND ACCEPTED.
19
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand (ECF #11) is GRANTED.
20
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Cross-Motion to Affirm (ECF #16) is
21
22
23
24
DENIED and this matter is remanded to the ALJ for calculation and award of benefits.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and
close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of May, 2015.
25
26
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
27
28
1
Refers to court’s docket number.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?