Johnson v. Cox et al

Filing 49

ORDER denying 43 and 44 Motions to Reconsider. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/30/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

______________________________________
)
)
LAUSTEVEION JOHNSON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
JAMES GREG COX et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

3:14-cv-00213-RCJ-WGC
ORDER

12
13

Plaintiff has asked the Court to overrule the Magistrate Judge’s April 1, 2015 rulings

14

denying his motions for appointment of counsel and his motions to compel. (See Orders, ECF

15

Nos. 40, 41). The Magistrate Judge adequately explained why appointment of counsel was not

16

appropriate and correctly determined that Plaintiff did not meet and confer before filing his

17

motions to compel and that the motions were without merit, in any case. Finding no error, the

18

Court denies the motions. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).

19

///

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24
1 of 2

1

CONCLUSION

2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions to Reconsider (ECF Nos. 43, 44) are

3

DENIED.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

Dated this 30th day April, 2015.
Dated this 23rd day ofof April, 2015.

6
7

_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2 of 2