Johnson v. Cox et al

Filing 54

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 5/27/2015, extending deadline for filing dispositive motions to 8/19/2015 and denying as moot 53 Motion to Stay Summary Judgment Briefing. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA LAUSTEVEION JOHNSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) JAMES GREG COX, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________________) 3:14-cv-00213-RCJ-WGC MINUTES OF THE COURT May 27, 2015 PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: Before the court is Defendants’ Motion to Stay Summary Judgment Briefing. (Doc. # 53.) Defendants have filed a motion to consolidate the Johnson v. Cox case with Johnson v. Nguyen, case no: 3:12-cv-00538-MMD-WGC in the first filed case (3:12-cv-00538-MMD-WGC, Doc. # 98). Defendants state the two cases concern the same Plaintiff, similar Defendants and common questions of fact. No opposition to that motion was filed. Defendants seek a stay of summary judgment briefing in the instant case pending a decision on the motion to consolidate the two cases. The docket in 3:12-cv-00538-MMD-WGC reflects the deadline for filing dispositive motions is August 19, 2015. Rather than staying the deadlines in this case, the court instead finds good cause to delay the deadline for filing dispositive motions in the instant case. Therefore, the deadline for filing dispositive motions is EXTENDED to and including August 19, 2015, which coincides with the deadline for filing dispositive motions in the 3:12-cv-00538 case. Defendants’ motion (Doc. # 53) is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED. LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK By: /s/ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?