Johnson v. Cox et al
Filing
54
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 5/27/2015, extending deadline for filing dispositive motions to 8/19/2015 and denying as moot 53 Motion to Stay Summary Judgment Briefing. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
LAUSTEVEION JOHNSON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
JAMES GREG COX, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
________________________________________)
3:14-cv-00213-RCJ-WGC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
May 27, 2015
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is Defendants’ Motion to Stay Summary Judgment Briefing. (Doc. # 53.)
Defendants have filed a motion to consolidate the Johnson v. Cox case with Johnson v. Nguyen, case
no: 3:12-cv-00538-MMD-WGC in the first filed case (3:12-cv-00538-MMD-WGC, Doc. # 98).
Defendants state the two cases concern the same Plaintiff, similar Defendants and common questions
of fact. No opposition to that motion was filed. Defendants seek a stay of summary judgment
briefing in the instant case pending a decision on the motion to consolidate the two cases. The docket
in 3:12-cv-00538-MMD-WGC reflects the deadline for filing dispositive motions is August 19,
2015.
Rather than staying the deadlines in this case, the court instead finds good cause to delay the
deadline for filing dispositive motions in the instant case. Therefore, the deadline for filing
dispositive motions is EXTENDED to and including August 19, 2015, which coincides with the
deadline for filing dispositive motions in the 3:12-cv-00538 case.
Defendants’ motion (Doc. # 53) is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:
/s/
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?