Mosby v. Baker et al

Filing 49

ORDER that respondents' motion for extension of time to file an answer to the petition (ECF No. 45 ) is granted nunc pro tunc; petitioner's motion for extension of time to file a reply in support of the answer (ECF No. 47 ) is granted nunc pro tunc. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/27/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5

***

6

MARVIN MOSBY,

7

Case No. 3:14-cv-00251-MMD-WGC
Petitioner,

ORDER

v.
8
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
9
Respondents.
10
11

Marvin Mosby’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition is before the court on

12

motions for extension of time by both parties. The Court finds good cause exists to grant

13

both motions.

14
15
16
17
18

It is therefore ordered that respondents’ motion for extension of time to file an
answer to the petition (ECF No. 45) is granted nunc pro tunc.
It is further ordered that petitioner’s motion for extension of time to file a reply in
support of the answer (ECF No. 47) is granted nunc pro tunc.
DATED THIS 27th day of August 2019.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE