Munoz v. Walsh et al
Filing
22
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 4/8/2015, vacating 18 Scheduling Order, reminding plaintiff to comply with change of address procedures, and denying as moot 21 Motion to Stay. Copy of this order shall be served on Plaintiff at all three addresses listed on Defendant's Certificate of Service 21 at 5 (mailed to all 3 addresses 4/8/15). (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
CESAR MUNOZ,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
LISA WALSH, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
________________________________________)
3:14-cv-00285-RCJ-WGC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
April 8, 2015
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is Defendant’s Motion for Stay (First Request). (Doc. #21.) Defendants seek
a stay of this action because they have been unsuccessful in contacting Plaintiff, but recently learned
from Plaintiff’s sister that Plaintiff is currently in the custody of the Carson City Sheriff’s Office.
The court will not stay this action, but instead VACATES the Scheduling Order (Doc. # 18)
entered on January 13, 2015. The courtroom deputy shall schedule a status conference on this matter
as soon as the court’s calendar will accommodate it.
Plaintiff is reminded that Local Special Rule 2-2 requires a plaintiff to “immediately file with
the Court written notification of any change of address” and that failure to comply with the Rule may
result in a dismissal of his action with prejudice.
A copy of this order shall be served on Plaintiff at all three addresses listed on Defendant’s
Certificate of Service of their motion. (Doc. # 21 at 5.)
Defendant’s motion (Doc. # 21) is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:
/s/
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?