Snow v. Mar et al
ORDER adopting and accepting ECF Nos. 100 Report and Recommendation and 122 Report and Recommendation; Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction ECF No. 84 and Defendants' Motion fro Summary Judgment ECF No. 105 are DENIED; Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Romero Aranas ECF Nos. 99 and 117 are GRANTED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 02/16/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
JOHN OLIVER SNOW,
CASE NO.: 3:14-CV-00290-RCJ-VPC
DAVID A. MAR, et al.,
Before the Court is the Reports and Recommendations of U.S. Magistrate Judge (ECF Nos. 100,
1221) entered on August 10, 2016 and January 23, 2017, recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s
Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 84); deny Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
(ECF No. 105); and grant Plaintiff’s Motions to Dismiss Romero Aranas (ECF Nos. 99, 117). On
February 6, 2017, Defendants filed Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF
No. 122) (ECF No. 125).
The Court has conducted it’s de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of
the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s
Reports and Recommendation (ECF No. 100) entered on August 10, 2016 and (ECF No. 122) entered
on January 23, 2017, should be ADOPTED AND ACCEPTED.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 84) is
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 105)
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motions to Dismiss Romero Aranas (ECF Nos. 99,
117) are GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 16TH day of February, 2017.
ROBERT C. JONES
Refers to court’s docket number.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?