Gonzalez-Soto v. Baca et al
Filing
27
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice for petitioner's failure to exhaust available state-court remedies for all grounds for relief. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this action. Certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/12/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
JESUS GONZALEZ-SOTO,
10
Petitioner,
11
vs.
12
Case No. 3:14-cv-00304-RCJ-WGC
ISIDRO BACA, et al.,
13
ORDER
Respondents.
14
15
On February 12, 2016, the court granted respondents’ motion to dismiss (#19), ruling that
16
petitioner had not exhausted his available state-court remedies for all of his grounds for relief. Order
17
(#26). The court instructed petitioner to declare what he wanted to do with the unexhausted
18
grounds. The court also stated that it would dismiss the action if petitioner did not respond.
19
Petitioner has not responded within the allotted time. The court will dismiss this action without
20
prejudice. The court makes no statement about the applicability of any procedural defense if
21
petitioner files another habeas corpus petition that challenges his custody pursuant to the same state-
22
court judgment of conviction.
23
Reasonable jurists would not find this conclusion to be debatable or wrong, and the court will
24
not issue a certificate of appealability.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for
2
petitioners’ failure to exhaust his available state-court remedies for all of his grounds for relief. The
3
clerk of the court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this action.
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
5
Dated: This 12th day of April, 2016.
DATED:
6
7
_________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?