Olausen v. Cox et al

Filing 14

ORDER DISMISSING CASE for failure to pay filing fee. Motion for appointment of counsel 10 denied as moot. A certificate of appealability is denied. Clerk shall add AG as counsel for respondents and electronically serve upon respondents copy of petition and this order (served via NEF 12/31/14). No response is necessary. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 12/30/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 JOHN STEVEN OLAUSEN, 10 Petitioner, 11 vs. 12 Case No. 3:14-cv-00315-RCJ-WGC GREG COX, et al., 13 ORDER Respondents. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 The court directed petitioner to pay the $5 filing fee. Order (#13). Petitioner has not complied with the order within the allotted time. The court will dismiss this action. Reasonable jurists would not find the court’s conclusion to be debatable or wrong, and the court will not issue a certificate of appealability. Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel (#10) is moot because the court is dismissing this action. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel (#10) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED for petitioner’s failure to pay the filing fee. The clerk of the court shall enter judgment accordingly. 25 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 26 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall add Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney 27 28 General for the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents. 1 2 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall electronically serve upon respondents a copy of the petition and this order. No response is necessary. Dated: This 30th day of December, 2014. Dated: 4 5 _________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?