Walden et al v. State of Nevada, et al
Filing
208
ORDER granting ECF No. 207 Stipulation for Enlargement of Time to file Reply to ECF No. 198 Motion to Dismiss. Reply due by 9/7/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
THIERMAN BUCK LLP
Mark R. Thierman, Nev. Bar No. 8285
mark@thiermanbuck.com
Joshua D. Buck, Nev. Bar No. 12187
josh@thiermanbuck.com
Leah L. Jones, Nev. Bar No. 13161
leah@thiermanbuck.com
7287 Lakeside Drive
Reno, Nevada 89511
Tel. (775) 284-1500
Fax. (775) 703-5027
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
THIERMAN BUCK LLP
7287 Lakeside Drive
Reno, NV 89511
(775) 284-1500 Fax (775) 703-5027
Email info@thiermanbuck.com www.thiermanbuck.com
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
12
13
14
DONALD WALDEN JR, NATHAN
ECHEVERRIA, AARON DICUS, BRENT
EVERIST, TRAVIS ZUFELT, TIMOTHY
RIDENOUR, and DANIEL TRACY on behalf
of themselves and all others similarly situated,
15
Plaintiffs,
16
v.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.: 3:14-cv-00320-MMD-WGC
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FOR
PLAINTIFFS TO FILE THEIR REPLY IN
SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
TO DISMISS CONSERVATION CAMPS
AND TRADITIONAL HOUSING
FACILITIES
THE STATE OF NEVADA, EX REL. ITS
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, and DOES 1-50,
(First Request1)
Defendants.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs, Donald
Walden Jr., Nathan Echeverria, Aaron Dicus, Brent Everist, Travis Zufelt, Timothy Ridenour,
and Daniel Tracy, on behalf of themselves and all others allegedly similarly situated
(“Plaintiffs”), by and through their counsel of record, and Defendant State of Nevada, ex rel. its
Department of Corrections (“NDOC”), by and through its counsel of record, (collectively, “The
Parties”) to extend the time for Plaintiffs to file their Reply in support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for
1
This is Plaintiffs’ First request for an extension of time. The Parties stipulated, and the
Court previously granted an extension of time for Defendants to file their Opposition. ECF No.
202.
-1STIPULATION FOR EOT FOR PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY I/S/O DISMISS NDOC CONSERVATION CAMPS
AND TRADITIONAL HOUSING FACILITIES
1
Dismissal of NDOC Conservation Camps and Traditional Housing Facilities and the Claims of
2
Opt-in Plaintiffs Who Worked at Those Facilities Without Prejudice.
3
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Dismissal of NDOC Conservation Camps and Traditional Housing
4
Facilities and the Claims of Opt-in Plaintiffs Who Worked at Those Facilities Without Prejudice
5
was filed on July 30, 2018. (ECF No. 198.) Defendants’ Opposition was timely filed on August
6
27, 2018. (ECF No. 206). Plaintiffs’ Reply is currently due Friday, August 31, 2018. Plaintiffs’
7
request a one week extension of time up to and including Friday, September 7, 2018.
THIERMAN BUCK LLP
7287 Lakeside Drive
Reno, NV 89511
(775) 284-1500 Fax (775) 703-5027
Email info@thiermanbuck.com www.thiermanbuck.com
8
9
Plaintiffs are requesting this extension of time due to counsels’ parental leave, preplanned vacation time, and workload.
10
This stipulation is made in good faith and is not for the purpose of undue burden or delay.
11
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
12
13
14
Dated this 28th day of August 2018.
Dated this 28th day of August 2018.
THIERMAN BUCK LLP
WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN
& DICKER LLP
/s/ Leah L. Jones
Mark R. Thierman, NV Bar No. 8285
Joshua D. Buck, NV Bar No. 12187
Leah L. Jones, NV Bar No. 13161
7287 Lakeside Drive
Reno, Nevada 89511
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
/s/ Richard I. Dreitzer
Richard I. Dreitzer
Nevada Bar No. 6626
David S. Kahn
Nevada Bar No. 7038
300 South Fourth Street, 11th Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorneys for Defendant State of Nevada,
ex rel. its Department of Corrections
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
28th
DATED this _________ day of
August
2018.
26
27
28
______________________________________
UNITED STATES JUDGE
-2STIPULATION FOR EOT FOR PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY I/S/O DISMISS NDOC CONSERVATION CAMPS
AND TRADITIONAL HOUSING FACILITIES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?