Walden et al v. State of Nevada, et al

Filing 298

ORDER - The Stipulation (ECF No. 297 ) is granted as follows: Plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion to Exclude (ECF No. 282 ) due by May 13, 2020 and Defendant's Reply due by May 27, 2020.Defendant's Reply to the Motion of Summary Judgment (ECF No. 276 ) due by June 3, 2020. Opposition deadline shall remain unchanged, due 5/13/2020.Defendant's Reply to the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 283 ) due by June 10, 2020. Oppositi on deadline shall remain unchanged, due 5/20/2020.Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/6/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB) Modified on 5/7/2020 to include that ECF No. 297 Stipulation was granted, NEF regenerated to parties (AB).

Download PDF
Case 3:14-cv-00320-MMD-WGC Document 298 Filed 05/06/20 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 THIERMAN BUCK LLP Mark R. Thierman, Nev. Bar No. 8285 mark@thiermanbuck.com Joshua D. Buck, Nev. Bar No. 12187 josh@thiermanbuck.com Leah L. Jones, Nev. Bar No. 13161 leah@thiermanbuck.com 7287 Lakeside Drive Reno, Nevada 89511 Tel. (775) 284-1500 Fax. (775) 703-5027 WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ, EDELMEN & DICKER LLP Sheri M. Thome, Esq., Nev. Bar No. 008657 James T. Tucker, Esq., Nev Bar No. 012507 Cara T. Laursen, Esq., Nev Bar No. 014563 300 South Fourth Street, 11th Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 727-1400 Facsimile: (702) 727-1401 Sheri.Thome@wilsonelser.com James.Tucker@wilsonelser.com CaraT.Laursen@wilsonelser.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Defendant The State of Nevada, ex rel. its Department of Corrections THIERMAN BUCK LLP 7287 Lakeside Drive Reno, NV 89511 (775) 284-1500 Fax (775) 703-5027 Email info@thiermanbuck.com www.thiermanbuck.com 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 DONALD WALDEN JR, NATHAN ECHEVERRIA, AARON DICUS, BRENT EVERIST, TRAVIS ZUFELT, TIMOTHY RIDENOUR, and DANIEL TRACY on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Case No.: 3:14-cv-00320-MMD-WGC STIPULATION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FOR RESPONSIVE MOTIONS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON (Second Request) Plaintiffs, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, EX REL. ITS NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, and DOES 1-50, Defendants. Plaintiffs DONALD WALDEN JR., NATHAN ECHEVERRIA, AARON DICUS, BRENT EVERIST, TRAVIS ZUFELT, TIMOTHY RIDENOUR, and DANIEL TRACY on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, and Defendant STATE OF NEVADA, EX. 26 REL. ITS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (collectively “The Parties), by and through their 27 respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for both Parties to file 28 their respective responsive pleadings as set forth below. - 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS Case 3:14-cv-00320-MMD-WGC Document 298 Filed 05/06/20 Page 2 of 3 1 This stipulation is submitted in compliance with LR IA 6-1. The Parties are requesting 2 these extension due to the volume of motions pending, the complexity and fact intensive nature 3 of the responsive pleadings, counsels’ professional commitments, existing workload, and the 4 continued challenges of working remotely due to the COVID-19 crisis, including slower 5 connectivity, communications delays, and obtaining records necessary to the motions. Good 6 cause exists for the requested extensions.1 7 Accordingly, the Parties further stipulate and agree to extend the deadlines as follows: THIERMAN BUCK LLP 7287 Lakeside Drive Reno, NV 89511 (775) 284-1500 Fax (775) 703-5027 Email info@thiermanbuck.com www.thiermanbuck.com 8 9 10 11 12 1. Plaintiffs’ Opposition to NDOC’s Motion to Exclude Evidence from Plaintiffs’ Expert ERC (ECF No. 282) currently due 5/6/20 shall be extended one (1) week to on or before Wednesday, May 13, 2020. Defendant’s Reply In Support Of shall be due on or before Wednesday, May 27, 2020. 2. 13 Plaintiffs’ Opposition to NDOC’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Sovereign 14 Immunity (ECF No. 276) currently due 5/13/20 which shall remain unchanged. The Parties 15 request that Defendant’s Reply In Support Of shall be due on or before Wednesday, June 3, 16 2020. 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// /// /// 1 The Court granted the Parties First Request for Extension of time on 4/13/20 at ECF No. 287. - 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS Case 3:14-cv-00320-MMD-WGC Document 297 Filed 05/05/20 Page 3 of 3 Case 3:14-cv-00320-MMD-WGC Document 298 Filed 05/06/20 Page 3 of 3 1 3. Plaintiffs’ Opposition to NDOC’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the Merits 2 of Plaintiffs FLSA Claims (ECF No. 283) currently due 5/20/20 which shall remain unchanged. 3 The Parties request that Defendant’s Reply In Support Of shall be due on or before 4 Wednesday, June 10, 2020. 5 6 7 THIERMAN BUCK LLP 7287 Lakeside Drive Reno, NV 89511 (775) 284-1500 Fax (775) 703-5027 Email info@thiermanbuck.com www.thiermanbuck.com 8 9 10 The Parties agree that the requested extension furthers the interest of this litigation and is not being requested in bad faith or to delay these proceedings unnecessarily. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: May 5, 2020. Dated: May 5, 2020. THIERMAN BUCK LLP WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ, EDELMEN & DICKER LLP /s/Leah L. Jones Mark R. Thierman, Esq., Bar No. 8285 Joshua D. Buck, Esq., Bar No. 12187 Leah L. Jones, Esq., Bar No. 13161 7287 Lakeside Drive Reno, Nevada 89511 Tel. (775) 284-1500 Fax. (775) 703-5027 /s/James T Tucker Sheri M. Thome, Esq., Bar No. 008657 James T. Tucker, Esq., Bar No. 012507 Cara T. Laursen, Esq., Bar No. 014563 300 South Fourth Street, 11th Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorneys for Defendants 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 19 20 ORDER 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 6th Dated this ____ day of May , 2020. 23 24 25 26 U.S. District Judge 27 28 - 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?