Szanto v. United States of America, et al.

Filing 13

ORDER denying 9 Motion to Reconsider; denying 12 Motion to Reopen Case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/16/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ______________________________________ ) ) In re PETER SZANTO, ) ) Debtor. _____________________________________ ) ) ) PETER SZANTO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. 3:14-cv-00322-RCJ Bankr. No. 13-bk-51261-BTB ORDER 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff–Debtor Peter Szanto asked the Court to withdraw the reference of his Chapter 11 bankruptcy case in its entirety based upon the alleged bias of the bankruptcy judge. The Court denied the motion, noting that: (1) the bankruptcy case had been dismissed on June 17, 2014; (2) the motion to withdraw the reference had been filed on June 18, 2014; and (3) a notice of appeal had been filed on June 19, 2014. Plaintiff–Debtor has asked the Court to reconsider and reopen his bankruptcy case. The Court denies the motion. The bankruptcy case has been appealed. This Court is presiding over that appeal, but the Court’s jurisdiction over the appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a) does not give the Court jurisdiction to enter substantive orders in the 24 1 of 2 1 bankruptcy case itself while the appeal is pending. Plaintiff–Debtor’s avenue of relief at this 2 stage is via the appeal. CONCLUSION 3 4 5 6 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions to Reconsider and Reopen Case (ECF Nos. 9, 12) are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: This 3rd dayday of September, 2014. Dated: This 16th of September, 2014. 8 9 10 _____________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?