Benchmark Insurance Company v. GL Construction Company et al
Filing
69
ORDER denying 59 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/11/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
BENCHMARK INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
7
8
9
10
11
vs.
3:14-cv-00326-RCJ-VPC
GL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY; GORDAN
LEMICH; CERBERUS HOLDINGS, LLC and
NORTHERN NEVADA HOMES, LLC,
ORDER
Defendants.
12
13
Pending before the Court is G.L. Construction (“G.L”) and Gordon Lemich’s (“Lemich”)
14
Motion for Reconsideration. (ECF No. 59). This is the second motion for reconsideration that
15
G.L. and Lemich have filed requesting that the Court revisit its October 29, 2014 Order, (ECF
16
No. 36), in which the Court denied their request for summary judgment on whether Benchmark
17
had a duty to defend G.L. in an underlying lawsuit. On November 5, 2014, G.L. and Lemich
18
filed their first objection to the denial summary judgment. The Court considered that motion and
19
denied it on January 9, 2015. (ECF No. 56). G.L. and Lemich now move for the Court to
20
reconsider its January 9, 2015 ruling and to again revisit the initial denial of summary judgment.
21
Reconsideration is appropriate if the Court “(1) is presented with newly discovered
22
evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is
23
an intervening change in controlling law.” Sch. Dist. No. 1J v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263
24
1
1
(9th Cir. 1993). The Court finds that none of these factors are present as to either the October
2
29, 2014 Order or the January 9, 2015 Order. Therefore, the Motion is denied.
3
4
5
6
CONCLUSION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that G.L. and Lemich’s Motion for Reconsideration (ECF
No. 59) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
DATED: This 11th day of February,
Dated: _______________________ 2015
9
10
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?