Gross v. Whiteman et al

Filing 29

ORDER - Plaintiff's # 28 Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 9/30/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

HAROLD E. GROSS,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CASEWORKER MEEGAN,
)
)
Defendants.
)
________________________________________)

3:14-cv-00365-MMD-WGC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
September 30, 2015

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:

KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is “Plaintiff’s Motion Seeking Leave for Courts Permission Ordering
Defendant to Answer Plaintiff’s Request for Second Interrogatories.” (ECF No. 28.) Plaintiff’s
motion did not attach the discovery which is pertinent to his motion. Local Rule 26-7(a), provides
that “All motions to compel discovery or for protective order shall set forth in full the text of the
discovery sought and the response thereto, if any.” Local Rule 26-7(b) also requires a party to meet
and confer to try to resolve a discovery dispute prior to pursuing a motion to compel. Plaintiff’s
motion does not satisfy the requirements and conditions of Local Rule 26-7.
Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 28) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By:

/s/
Deputy Clerk