Flowers v. Baca et al

Filing 14

ORDER re 9 , 12 Notice of Appeal (USCA Case 14-16932). The appeal would be taken "in good faith". Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/21/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; copy sent via NEF to USCA - JC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ISIDRO BACA et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ___________________________________ ) 13 I. 7 8 9 10 11 JOHN FLOWERS, 3:14-cv-366-RCJ-WGC ORDER DISCUSSION 14 On September 29, 2014, this Court issued a screening order granting Plaintiff’s 15 application to proceed in forma pauperis but dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint in its entirety. 16 (ECF No. 5 at 8). This Court did not indicate whether an appeal would be taken “in good faith” 17 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). On October 8, 2014, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal. 18 (ECF No. 12). That same day, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an order directing this 19 Court to indicate whether Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status should continue for the appeal. 20 (ECF No. 13). The Court now finds the appeal would be taken “in good faith” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 21 22 § 1915(a)(3). 23 II. 24 25 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the appeal would be taken “in good faith” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). 26 27 Dated: This 21st day of October, 2014. DATED: This _____ day of October, 2014. 28 _________________________________ United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?