Federal Trade Commission v. CardFlex, Inc. et al

Filing 37

PERMANENT INJUNCTION and Final Order Against Defendants Blaze Processing, LLC, Mach 1 Merchanting, LLC, and Shane Fisher. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/27/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Case 3:14-cv-00397-MMD-GWF Document 3-1 Filed 07/30/14 Page 1 of 19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICTNEVADA
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
CARDFLEX, INC., a California Corporation;
BLAZE PROCESSING, LLC, an Idaho limited liability
company;

3:14-cv-397-MMD-GWF
CIVIL NO. _________

MACH 1 MERCHANTING, LLC, an Idaho limited
liability company;

[Proposed]
STIPULATED
PERMANENT
INJUNCTION AND FINAL
ORDER AGAINST
DEFENDANTS BLAZE
PROCESSING, LLC; MACH
1 MERCHANTING, LLC;
AND SHANE FISHER

ANDREW PHILLIPS, individually and as an officer of
CardFlex, Inc.;
JOHN BLAUGRUND, individually and as an officer of
CardFlex, Inc.;
SHANE FISHER, individually and as a manager of
Blaze Processing, LLC, and Mach 1 Merchanting, LLC;
and JEREMY LIVINGSTON, individually and as a
manager of Blaze Processing, LLC, and Mach 1
Merchanting, LLC;
Defendants.

Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or the “Commission”), has, concurrently
herewith, filed its Complaint against CardFlex, Inc. (“CardFlex”), Blaze Processing, LLC,
(“Blaze”), Mach 1 Merchanting LLC (“Mach 1”), Andrew Phillips, John Blaugrund, Shane
Fisher and Jeremy Livingston (“Defendants”), for a permanent injunction and other equitable
relief in this action, pursuant to Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC
Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 53(b). The FTC and Blaze, Mach 1, and Fisher (“Settling Defendants”)
stipulate to the entry of this Order to resolve all matters in dispute in this action between them.

1

Case 3:14-cv-00397-MMD-GWF Document 3-1 Filed 07/30/14 Page 2 of 19

THEREFORE, it is ORDERED as follows:
FINDINGS
1.

This Court has jurisdiction over this matter.

2.

The Complaint charges that Defendants participated in unfair acts or

practices in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), by enabling merchants to
impose unauthorized charges to consumers’ credit and debit card accounts.
3.

Settling Defendants neither admit nor deny any of the allegations in the

Complaint, except as specifically stated in the Order. Only for purposes of this action, Settling
Defendants admit the facts necessary to establish jurisdiction.
4.

Settling Defendants waive all rights to seek appellate review or otherwise

challenge or contest the validity of this Order. Settling Defendants further waive and release any
claim they may have against Plaintiff, its employees, representatives, or agents.
5.

Settling Defendants waive any claim that they may hold under the Equal

Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, concerning the prosecution of this action through the
date of this Order, and agrees to bear its own costs and attorney’s fees.
6.

Settling Defendants waive all rights to appeal or otherwise challenge the

validity of this Order.
DEFINITIONS
For the purpose of this Order, the following definitions shall apply:
1.

“ACH Debit” means any completed or attempted debit to a Person’s

account at a financial institution that is processed electronically through the Automated Clearing
House Network.

2

Case 3:14-cv-00397-MMD-GWF Document 3-1 Filed 07/30/14 Page 3 of 19

2.

“Client” means any Person (a) who obtains, directly or indirectly, from any

Settling Defendant a merchant account that enables the acceptance of payments from a consumer
for goods, services, or charitable donations; or (b) for whom any Settling Defendant act as a
Sales Agent, either directly or indirectly.
3.

“Corporate Defendant” and “Corporate Defendants” means Blaze

Processing, LLC (“Blaze”), Mach 1 Merchanting LLC (“Mach 1”), and their successors and
assigns.
4.

“Defendant” and “Defendants” means CardFlex, Blaze, Mach 1, Andrew

M. Phillips, John S. Blaugrund, Shane Fisher and Jeremy Livingston, individually, collectively,
or in any combination.
5.

“Independent Sales Organization” or “ISO” means any Person that (a) enters

into an agreement or contract with a Payment Processor to sell or market Payment Processing
services to a merchant; and (b) holds, directly or indirectly, either partial or full liability in the
event of losses related to the Payment Processing activities conducted by or on behalf of the
merchant.
6.

“Individual Defendant” means Shane Fisher.

7.

“iWorks” means the entities and individuals named as defendants in FTC v.

Jeremy Johnson, et al. No. 2:10-cv-2203-RLH-GWF (D. Nev., filed December 21, 2010), and
Big Bucks Pro, Inc.; Blue Streak Processing, Inc.; Bottom Dollar, Inc.; Bumble Marketing, Inc.;
Business Loan Success, Inc.; Cutting Edge Processing, Inc.; Diamond J. Media, Inc.; Ebusiness
First, Inc.; Ebusiness Success, Inc.; Ecom Success, Inc.; Excess Net Success, Inc.; Fiscal
Fidelity, Inc.; Funding Search Success, Inc.; Funding Success, Inc.; GG Processing, Inc.; GGL
Rewards, Inc.; Hooper Processing, Inc.; Internet Fitness, Inc.; Net Business Success, Inc.; Net

3

Case 3:14-cv-00397-MMD-GWF Document 3-1 Filed 07/30/14 Page 4 of 19

Commerce, Inc.; Net Discounts, Inc.; Net Fit Trends, Inc.; Network Agenda, LLC; Optimum
Assistance, Inc.; Pro Internet Services, Inc.; Razor Processing, Inc.; Simcor Marketing, Inc.;
Summit Processing, Inc.; Unlimited Processing, Inc.; Xcel Processing, Inc., and any other entity
owned or controlled by Jeremy Johnson.
8.

“Payment Processing” means providing a Person, directly or indirectly, with

the means used to charge or debit accounts through the use of any payment mechanism,
including, but not limited to, Remotely Created Payment Orders, Remotely Created Checks,
ACH Debits, or debit, credit, prepaid, or stored value cards. Whether accomplished through the
use of software or otherwise, Payment Processing includes, among other things: (a) reviewing
and approving merchant applications for payment processing services; (b) providing the means
to transmit sales transaction data from merchants to acquiring banks or other financial
institutions; (c) clearing, settling, or distributing proceeds of sales transactions from acquiring
banks or financial institutions to merchants; or (d) processing Chargebacks or returned Remotely
Created Payment Orders, Remotely Created Checks, or ACH Debits.
9.

“Payment Processor” means any Person providing Payment Processing

services in connection with another Person’s sale of goods or services, or in connection with any
charitable donation.
10.

“Person” means any natural person or any entity, corporation, partnership, or

association of persons.
11.

“Remotely Created Check” or “RCC” means a check that is not created by

the paying bank and that does not bear a signature applied, or purported to be applied, by the
Person on whose financial account the check is drawn. A remotely created check is often also
referred to as a “demand draft,” “telephone check” or “preauthorized draft.” For purposes of this

4

Case 3:14-cv-00397-MMD-GWF Document 3-1 Filed 07/30/14 Page 5 of 19

definition, a remotely created check originates as a paper-based transaction, but can be processed
subsequently through electronic means (such as through check imaging or scanning) or through
non-electronic means.
12.

“Remotely Created Payment Order” or “RCPO” means a payment

instruction or order drawn on a Person’s financial account that is initiated or created by the payee
and that does not bear a signature applied, or purported to be applied, by the Person on whose
financial account the order is drawn, and which is deposited into or cleared through the check
clearing system. For purposes of this definition, unlike a Remotely Created Check, a Remotely
Created Payment Order does not originate as a paper-based transaction. A Remotely Created
Payment Order is created when a payee directly or indirectly enters financial account and routing
numbers into an electronic check template that is converted into an electronic file for deposit into
the check clearing system.
13.

“Sales Agent” means a Person that matches, arranges, or refers prospective

Clients or Clients to a Payment Processor or ISO for Payment Processing, but does not hold any
contractual liability in the event of losses related to the Payment Processing activities conducted
by or on behalf of Clients. As such, a Sales Agent may be involved in recommending a
particular Payment Processor or ISO to a prospective Client, forwarding to the Payment
Processor or ISO a prospective Client’s or Client’s merchant application, or negotiating rates and
fees charged by a Payment Processor or ISO, but a Sales Agent may not be involved in any
Payment Processing and may not act as an ISO.
14. “Settling Defendants” means Blaze, Mach 1, and Shane Fisher individually,
collectively, or in any combination.
15. The words “and” and “or” shall be understood to have both conjunctive and

5

Case 3:14-cv-00397-MMD-GWF Document 3-1 Filed 07/30/14 Page 6 of 19

disjunctive meanings.
I.
PROHIBITION AGAINST PAYMENT PROCESSING OR ACTING AS AN ISO OR
SALES AGENT
IT IS ORDERED that Settling Defendants, their successors and assigns, whether acting
directly or through any Person, subsidiary division, or other device, are permanently restrained
and enjoined from Payment Processing or acting as an ISO or Sales Agent for any Client.
Provided, however, that this section shall not prevent Defendant Shane Fisher from obtaining
payment processing services for the purpose of accepting payments from consumers for goods
and services sold by or on behalf of any business in which Shane Fisher owns at least a twenty
five percent share.
II.
MONETARY JUDGMENT
A. Judgment in the amount of $328,467.23 (Three Hundred Twenty- Eight Thousand, Four
Hundred Sixty-Seven Dollars and Twenty-Three Cents) is entered in favor of the
Commission against the Individual Defendant, as equitable monetary relief.
B. Judgment in the amount of $270,802.84 (Two Hundred Seventy Thousand, Eight
Hundred and Two Dollars and Eighty-Four Cents) is entered in favor of the Commission
against Defendant Mach 1, as equitable monetary relief.
C. Judgment in the amount of $386,131.62 (Three Hundred Eighty-Six Thousand, One
Hundred Thirty-One Dollars and Sixty-Two Cents) is entered in favor of the Commission
against Defendant Blaze, as equitable monetary relief.
D. Individual Defendant is ordered to pay to the Commission $328,467.23 (Three Hundred
Twenty- Eight Thousand, Four Hundred Sixty-Seven Dollars and Twenty-Three Cents),

6

Case 3:14-cv-00397-MMD-GWF Document 3-1 Filed 07/30/14 Page 7 of 19

which, as he stipulates, he transferred to his undersigned counsel on May 19, 2014 to
hold in escrow for no purpose other than payment of this Judgment to the Commission.
The escrowed funds shall be paid to the Commission within 7 days of entry of this Order
by electronic fund transfer in accordance with instructions previously provided by a
representative of the Commission.
E. Mach 1 is ordered to pay the Commission $100.01 (One hundred One Dollars and One
Cent) which, as Mach 1 stipulates, Mach 1 transferred to its undersigned counsel on May
19, 2014 to hold in escrow for no purpose other than payment of this Judgment to the
Commission. The escrowed funds shall be paid to the Commission within 7 days of entry
of this Order by electronic fund transfer in accordance with instructions previously
provided by a representative of the Commission. Upon such payment, the remainder of
the judgment issuspended, subject to Subsections G – I below.
F. Blaze is ordered to pay the Commision $40.54 (Forty Dollars and Fifty Four Cents)
which, as Blaze stipulates, Blaze transferred to its undersigned counsel on May 19, 2014
to hold in escrow for no purpose other than payment of this Judgment to the
Commission. The escrowed funds shall be paid to the Commission within 7 days of entry
of this Order by electronic fund transfer in accordance with instructions previously
provided by a representative of the Commission. Upon such payment, the remainder of
the judgment issuspended, subject to Subsections G – I below.
G. The Commission’s agreement to the suspension of part of the judgments against
Corporate Defendants Mach 1 and Blaze is expressly premised upon the truthfulness,
accuracy and completeness of the the Declaration of Shane Fisher in his capacity as a
Member of Mach 1 and Blaze, dated May 19, 2014.

7

Case 3:14-cv-00397-MMD-GWF Document 3-1 Filed 07/30/14 Page 8 of 19

H. The suspension of the judgment will be lifted as to any Corporate Defendant if, upon
motion by the Commission, the Court finds that the Corporate Defendant failed to
disclose any material asset, materially misstated the value of any asset, or made any other
material misstatement or omission in the Declaration of Shane Fisher identified above.
I. If the suspension of the judgment is lifted, the judgment becomes immediately due as to
that Corporate Defendant in the amount specified in Subsections B and C above which
the parties stipulate only for purposes of this Section represents the unjust enrichment
alleged in the Complaint less any payment previously made pursuant to this Section plus
interest computed from the date of entry of this Order.
J. Settling Defendants relinquish dominion and all legal and equitable right, title, and
interest in all assets transferred pursuant to this Order and may not seek the return of any
assets.
K. The facts alleged in the Complaint will be taken as true, without further proof, in any
subsequent proceeding by or on behalf of the Commission to enforce its rights to any
payment or monetary judgment pursuant to this Order in a nondischargeability complaint
in any bankruptcy case.
L. The facts alleged in the Complaint establish all elements necessary to sustain an action
by the Commission pursuant to Section 523(a)(2)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11
U.S.C. §523(a)(2)(A), and this Order will have collateral estoppel effect for such
purposes.
M. Settling Defendants acknowledge that the Taxpayer Identification Numbers (Social
Security Numbers or Employer Identification Numbers), which Settling Defendants
previously submitted to the Commission, may be used for collecting and reporting on any

8

Case 3:14-cv-00397-MMD-GWF Document 3-1 Filed 07/30/14 Page 9 of 19

delinquent amount arising out of this Order, in accordance with 31 U.S.C. §7701.
N. All money paid to the Commission pursuant to this Order may be deposited into a fund
administered by the Commission or its designee to be used for equitable relief, including
consumer redress and any attendant expenses for the administration of any redress fund.
If a representative of the Commission decides that direct redress to consumers is wholly
or partially impracticable or money remains after redress is completed, the Commission
may apply any remaining money for such other equitable relief (including consumer
information remedies) as it determines to be reasonably related to Settling Defendants’
practices alleged in the Complaint. Any money not used for such equitable relief is to be
deposited to the U.S. Treasury as disgorgement. Individual Defendant has no right to
challenge any actions the Commission or its representatives may take pursuant to this
Subsection.
III.
PROHIBITION ON USE
OF CONSUMER ACCOUNT INFORMATION
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Settling Defendants, whether acting directly or
through any Person, subsidiary, division, or other device, are permanently restrained and
enjoined from:
A. Disclosing, using, or benefitting from iWorks customer information, including the name,
address, telephone number, email address, social security number, other identifying
information, or any data that enables access to a customer’s account (including a credit
card, bank account, or other financial account), which was obtained by any Settling
Defendant prior to entry of this Order; and
Retaining
B. Failing to dispose of such customer information in all forms in their possession, custody,

9

Case 3:14-cv-00397-MMD-GWF Document 3-1 Filed 07/30/14 Page 10 of 19

or control within thirty (30) days after entry of this Order.
PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that customer information need not be disposed of, and may be
disclosed, to the extent requested by a government agency or required by a law, regulation, or
court order.
IV.
COOPERATION
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Settling Defendants must fully cooperate with
representatives of the Commission in this case and in any investigation related to or associated
with the transactions or the occurrences that are the subject of the Complaint. Settling
Defendants must provide truthful and complete information, evidence, and testimony. Settling
Defendants must appear and must cause Corporate Defendants’ officers, employees,
representatives, or agents to appear for interviews, discovery, hearings, trials, and any other
proceedings that Commission representative may reasonably request upon 5 days written notice,
or other reasonable notice, at such places and times as Commission representative may
designate, without the service of a subpoena.
V.
ORDER ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Settling Defendants obtain acknowledgments of
receipt of this Order:
A. Each Settling Defendant, within 7 days of entry of this Order, must submit to the
Commission an acknowledgment of receipt of this Order sworn under penalty of
perjury.
B. For ten (10) years after entry of this Order, Individual Defendant for any business

10

Case 3:14-cv-00397-MMD-GWF Document 3-1 Filed 07/30/14 Page 11 of 19

that Individual Defendant, individually or collectively with any other Defendant, is
the majority owner or directly or indirectly controls, and each Corporate
Defendant, must deliver a copy of this Order to: (1) all principals, officers,
directors, and LLC members and managers; (2) all employees, agents, and
representatives who participate in conduct related to the subject matter of the
Order; and (3) any business entity resulting from any change in structure as set
forth in the Section titled Compliance Reporting. Delivery must occur within
seven days of entry of this Order for current personnel. For all others, delivery
must occur before they assume their responsibilities.
C. From each individual or entity to which Settling Defendant delivered a copy of this
Order, that Settling Defendant must obtain, within 30 days, a signed and dated
acknowledgment of receipt of this Order.
VI.
COMPLIANCE REPORTING
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Settling Defendants make timely submissions to the
Commission:
A. 180 days after entry of this Order, each Settling Defendant must submit a
compliance report, sworn under penalty of perjury:
1. Each Settling Defendant must:
i. Identify the primary physical, postal, and email address and
telephone number, as designated points of contact, which
representatives of the Commission may use to communicate with
Settling Defendant;

11

Case 3:14-cv-00397-MMD-GWF Document 3-1 Filed 07/30/14 Page 12 of 19

ii. Identify all of that Settling Defendant’s businesses by all of their
names, telephone numbers, and physical, postal, email and Internet
addresses;
iii. Describe the activities of each business, including the goods and
services offered, and the involvement of any other Defendant (which
Individual Defendants must describe if they know or should know
due to their own involvement);
iv. Describe in detail whether and how that Settling Defendant is in
compliance with each Section of this Order; and
v. Provide a copy of each Order Acknowledgement obtained pursuant
to this Order, unless previously submitted to the Commission;
2. Additionally, Individual Defendant must:
i. Identify all telephone numbers and all physical, postal, email and
Internet addresses, including all residences;
ii. Identify all business activities, including any business for which
Individual Defendant performs services whether as an employee or
otherwise and any entity in which such Individual Defendant has
any ownership interest; and
iii. Describe in detail Individual Defendant’s involvement in each such
business, including title, role, responsibilities, participation,
authority, control, and any ownership.
B. For ten (10) years following entry of this Order, Settling Defendants must submit a
compliance notice, sworn under penalty of perjury, within 14 days of any change in

12

Case 3:14-cv-00397-MMD-GWF Document 3-1 Filed 07/30/14 Page 13 of 19

the following:
1. Each Settling Defendant must report a change in:
i. Any designated point of contact;
ii. The structure of any Corporate Defendant or any entity that Settling
Defendant has any ownership interest in or controls directly or
indirectly that may affect compliance obligations arising under this
Order, including: creation, merger, sale, or dissolution of the entity
or any subsidiary, parent, or affiliate that engages in any acts or
practices subject to this Order.
2. Additionally, Individual Defendant must report any change in:
i. Name, including aliases or fictitious name, or residence address; or
ii. Title or role in any business activity, including any business for
which Individual Defendant performs services whether as an
employee or otherwise and any entity in which Individual Defendant
has any ownership interest, and identify the name, physical address,
and any Internet address of the business or entity.
C. Each Settling Defendant must submit to the Commission notice of the filing of any
bankruptcy petition, insolvency proceeding, or similar proceeding by or against
such Settling Defendant within 14 days of its filing.
D. Any submission to the Commission required by this Order to be sworn under
penalty of perjury must be true and accurate and comply with 28 U.S.C. § 1746,
such as by concluding: “I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the
United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed

13

Case 3:14-cv-00397-MMD-GWF Document 3-1 Filed 07/30/14 Page 14 of 19

on:_____” and supplying the date, signatory’s full name, title (if applicable), and
signature.
E. Unless otherwise directed by a Commission representative in writing, all
submissions to the Commission pursuant to this Order must be emailed to
[e-mail] or sent by overnight courier (not the U.S. Postal Service) to:
Associate Director for Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal
Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20580. The
subject line must begin: FTC v. CardFlex, Inc.
VII.
RECORDKEEPING
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Settling Defendants must create certain records for 10
years after entry of the Order, and retain each such record for 5 years. Specifically, Corporate
Defendants and Individual Defendant, for any business that such Setting Defendant, individually
or collectively with any other Defendant, is a majority owner or controls directly or indirectly,
must create and maintain the following records:
A. Accounting records showing the revenues from all goods or services sold;
B. Personnel records showing, for each person providing services, whether as an
employee or otherwise, that person’s: name, addresses, and telephone numbers; job
title or position; dates of service; and, if applicable, the reason for termination;
C. Records of all consumer complaints and refund requests, whether received directly
or indirectly, such as through a third party, and any response; and
D. All records necessary to demonstrate full compliance with each provision of this
Order, including all submissions to the Commission.

14

Case 3:14-cv-00397-MMD-GWF Document 3-1 Filed 07/30/14 Page 15 of 19

VIII.
COMPLIANCE MONITORING
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the purpose of monitoring Settling Defendant’s
compliance with this Order and any failure to transfer any assets as required by this Order:
A. Within 14 days of receipt of a written request from a representative of the
Commission, each Settling Defendant must: submit additional compliance reports
or other requested information, which must be sworn under penalty of perjury;
appear for depositions; and produce documents for inspection and copying. The
Commission is also authorized to obtain discovery, without further leave of court,
using any of the procedures prescribed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 29, 30
(including telephonic depositions), 31, 33, 34, 36, 45, and 69.
B. For matters concerning this Order, the Commission is authorized to communicate
directly with Settling Defendants. Settling Defendants must permit representatives
of the Commission to interview any employee or other Person affiliated with any
Settling Defendant who has agreed to such an interview. The Person interviewed
may have counsel present.
C. The Commission may use all other lawful means, including posing, through its
representatives, as consumers, suppliers, or other individuals or entities, to Settling
Defendant or any individual or entity affiliated with Settling Defendant, without the
necessity of identification or prior notice. Nothing in this Order limits the
Commission’s lawful use of compulsory process, pursuant to Sections 9 and 20 of
the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 49, 57b-1.

15

Case 3:14-cv-00397-MMD-GWF Document 3-1 Filed 07/30/14 Page 16 of 19

IX.
RETENTION OF JURISDICTION
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court retains jurisdiction of this matter for
purposes of construction, modification, and enforcement of this Order.

October
27th
SO ORDERED, this ______ day of __________________________ , 2014.

_________________________________
United States District Judge
The parties, by their respective counsel, hereby consent to the terms and conditions of the
Order as set forth above and consent to the entry thereof.

16

Case 3:14-cv-00397-MMD-GWF Document 3-1 Filed 07/30/14 Page 17 of 19

Case 3:14-cv-00397-MMD-GWF Document 3-1 Filed 07/30/14 Page 18 of 19

Case 3:14-cv-00397-MMD-GWF Document 3-1 Filed 07/30/14 Page 19 of 19