Kakowski v. Smith et al
Filing
19
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 18 motion for Court to acknowledge having exhibits. Clerk shall send Plaintiff copy of 4 Exhibits (mailed 6/2/15). Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/1/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
GREG SMITH et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
___________________________________ )
13
I.
7
8
9
10
11
BRIAN KAKOWSKI,
3:14-cv-413-RCJ-WGC
ORDER
DISCUSSION
On October 21, 2014, this Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to voluntarily dismiss this
14
15
case.
16
acknowledge that it had a copy of Plaintiff’s previously filed exhibits because he was going to
17
file a new case and direct this Court to refer to those exhibits. (ECF No. 18). The Court grants
18
the motion in part and denies it in part. The Court acknowledges that it has received Plaintiff’s
19
previously filed exhibits. (See ECF No. 4). However, the Court will not refer back to the
20
exhibits in this closed case when Plaintiff initiates a new case. Instead, the Court directs the
21
Clerk of the Court to send Plaintiff a copy of his exhibits. Plaintiff shall file his exhibits in his
22
new case.
23
II.
On May 21, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion asking this Court to
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for Court to acknowledge
24
25
(ECF No. 12).
having exhibits (ECF No. 18) is granted in part and denied in part.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff a copy of his
26
27
exhibits (ECF No. 4).
28
///
1
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file his exhibits in his new case when he
initiates one.
3
4
Dated: June 1, 2015. day of May, 2015.
DATED: This _____
5
6
_________________________________
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?