Ochoa v. Baker et al

Filing 3

ORDER directing Plaintiff to pay the full $400 filing fee within 30 days. The Clerk shall send two copies of this order to Plaintiff, one to be returned with filing fee payment (mailed 8/25/2014). The Clerk shall retain the 1 -1 complaint. (Payment of filing fees due 9/24/2014.) Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/25/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) RENEE BAKER et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ___________________________________ ) 14 I. 8 9 10 11 12 ARTURO T. OCHOA, 3:14-cv-416-RCJ-WGC SCREENING ORDER DISCUSSION 15 Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff has submitted a civil rights complaint 16 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1-1). Plaintiff has not submitted an application to 17 proceed in forma pauperis and has not paid the full filing fee for this case. On at least three 18 (3) occasions, the Court has dismissed civil actions commenced by Plaintiff while in detention 19 as frivolous or for failure to state a claim upon which any relief may be granted.1 20 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), “if [a] prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while 21 incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United 22 States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim 23 upon which relief may be granted,” he may not proceed in forma pauperis and, instead, must 24 pay the full $400.00 filing fee in advance unless he is “under imminent danger of serious 25 physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 26 27 28 1 See Ochoa v. Cook et al., 3:02-cv-450-LRH-VPC; Ochoa v. Willis et al., 3:02-cv-545ECR-VPC (both dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted); Ochoa v. Putter et al., 3:10-cv-364-HDM-RAM (dismissed as delusional and factually frivolous). The Court takes judicial notice of its prior records in the above matters. 1 In his complaint, Plaintiff appears to allege his dissatisfaction with the prison food. (See 2 generally ECF No. 1-1.) The Court finds that these allegations fail to plausibly allege that 3 Plaintiff is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 4 1047, 1055 (9th Cir. 2007) (holding that the exception to § 1915(g) applies if the complaint 5 makes a plausible allegation that the prisoner faced imminent danger of serious physical injury 6 at the time of filing). To the extent that Plaintiff is alleging that prison officials are poisoning 7 his food, the Court notes that Plaintiff has filed several complaints in the past making those 8 same allegations and that the Court finds that such allegations are delusional and factually 9 frivolous. As such, Plaintiff must pre-pay the $400.00 filing fee in full. 10 II. CONCLUSION 11 For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that this action will be dismissed without 12 prejudice unless Plaintiff pays the $400.00 filing fee in full within thirty (30) days of entry of this 13 order. 14 It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff two copies of this 15 order. Plaintiff shall make the necessary arrangements to have one copy of this order 16 attached to the check paying the filing fee. 17 It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court shall retain the complaint (ECF No. 1-1). 18 19 Dated: This 25th day day of August, 2014. DATED: This _____ of August, 2014. 20 21 _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?