Diaz et al v. Wheeler
Filing
33
ORDER granting ECF No. 30 Motion to Lift Stay, case stay lifted; giving Defendant 20 days to file a renewed motion for summary judgment, if any. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/19/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
***
JSB, a minor, by his parents and natural 3:14-cv-0436-LRH-WGC
guardians MARINA DIAZ and JOSE DIAZ,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
ORDER
v.
CARSON CITY DEPUTY
HARRY W. WHEELER,
SHERIFF
14
Defendant.
15
16
Before the court is plaintiff JSB’s motion to lift stay. ECF No. 30. Defendant
17
Carson City Deputy Sheriff Harry W. Wheeler (“Deputy Wheeler”) filed an opposition
18
(ECF No. 31) to which JSB replied (ECF No. 32).
19
On August 19, 2014, JSB, a minor, by and through his parents and natural
20
guardians Marina Diaz and Jose Diaz, filed the underlying complaint against Deputy
21
Wheeler alleging two causes of action related to an altercation that took place on May
22
20, 2014: (1) a Section 1983 claim for excessive force; and (2) common law assault and
23
battery. ECF No. 1.
24
While this action was pending, juvenile proceedings were commenced against
25
JSB for Interference with a City or Sherriff’s Officer in violation of Carson City Municipal
26
Code §8.04.050 related to the May 20, 2014 altercation. On October 14, 2014, after a
27
fact-finding hearing, the Juvenile Court Master found that on May 20, 2014, JSB
28
unlawfully hindered, obstructed, resisted, delayed and/or engaged in physical behavior
1
to prevent cooperation with law enforcement officers in violation of the municipal code.
2
JSP appealed that decision arguing that the master’s finding was in error as JSB was
3
not allowed to present evidence that his interference with the officers was caused by,
4
and a direct result of, Deputy Wheeler’s alleged use of excessive force.
5
A second fact-finding hearing was held on May 20, 2015, by a different Juvenile
6
Court Master during which JSB presented evidence of Deputy Wheeler’s alleged
7
excessive force. On June 1, 2015, the new Juvenile Court Master issued a finding that
8
that JSB had violated Carson City Municipal Code §8.04.050 beyond a reasonable
9
doubt, and that Deputy Wheeler had not engaged in excessive force causing JSB’s
10
conduct. JSB again appealed the special master’s finding.
11
While JSB’s appeal was pending, Deputy Wheeler filed a motion for summary
12
judgment in this action. ECF No. 16. After the motion for summary judgment was filed,
13
state court Judge James Wilson issued an order affirming the Juvenile Court Masters’
14
findings of fact that JSB had committed the offense of Interference with a City or
15
Sherriff’s Officer as defined by Carson City Municipal Code §8.04.050. Subsequently,
16
on October 23, 2015, JSB filed an appeal of Judge Wilson’s order to the Nevada
17
Supreme Court. In response, this court denied Deputy Wheeler’s motion for summary
18
judgment without prejudice, stating that the court would allow Deputy Wheeler to re-file
19
the motion subsequent to the outcome of JSB’s appeal. ECF No. 28. In that same order,
20
the court stayed this action pending JSB’s appeal. Id.
21
On March 5, 2016, JSB filed a notice with the court indicating that the Nevada
22
Supreme
Court
had
found
Carson
City
Municipal
Code
§8.04.050
to
be
23
unconstitutionally vague. ECF No. 29. The notice also stated that on March 3, 2016,
24
Judge Russell of the First Judicial District Court entered an order dismissing the charge
25
against JSB and vacating the Juvenile Masters’ findings of fact. Id. Thereafter, JSB filed
26
the present motion to lift stay. ECF No. 30.
27
The court has reviewed the documents on file in this matter and finds that
28
because JSB’s appeal to the Nevada Supreme Court has concluded, the stay entered
1
on November 24, 2015, should be lifted. Accordingly, the court shall grant JSB’s motion
2
and lift the stay in this action. Similarly, in accordance with the court’s prior order,
3
Deputy Wheeler is granted leave to file a renewed motion for summary judgment.
4
5
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to lift stay (ECF No. 30) is
6
GRANTED. The stay entered in this action, 3:14-cv-0436-LRH-WGC, is LIFTED,
7
effective immediately.
8
9
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant shall have twenty (20) days after
entry of this order to file a renewed motion for summary judgment, if any.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
DATED this 19th day of July, 2016.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?