Wingo v. Gedney et al

Filing 27

ORDERED that Defendants' 17 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's 21 Motion to Exclude Defendant Baca is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/23/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4

KIRK D. WINGO,

5

CASE NO.: 3:14-CV-00449-RCJ-VPC
Plaintiff,
ORDER

6

v.

7

DR. KAREN GEDNEY, et al.,

8

Defendants.
_______________________________________

9
10

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge (#241) entered on

11

January 20, 2016, recommending that the Court grant Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss (ECF #17)

12

and deny as moot Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude Defendant Baca (ECF #21). Plaintiff filed Objections

13

Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation or in the Alternative Motion to Clarify and/or Grant

14

Relief Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56(f) (ECF #25) on February 3, 2016, and

15

Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiff’s Objection to U.S. Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation

16

(ECF #26) filed February 17, 2016.

17

The Court has conducted it’s de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of

18

the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant

19

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s

20

Report and Recommendation (#24) entered on January 20, 2016, should be ADOPTED AND

21

ACCEPTED.

22

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF #17) is GRANTED.

23

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude Defendant Baca (ECF #21) is

24
25

DENIED as MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of February, 2016.

26
27

_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES

28

1

Refers to court’s docket number.