Ramet v. LeGrande et al

Filing 6

ORDER directing Counsel for petitioner to meet with petitioner as soon as reasonably possible. Petitioner to file and serve an amended petition within 90 days; respondents to respond within 30 days thereafter; petitioner to reply within 30 days of response. Any state court exhibits shall be filed with separate index. Hard copies of any exhibits shall be forwarded to the staff attorneys in Reno. (Amended Petition due by 4/9/2015.) Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/9/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 DANIEL A. RAMET, Case No. 3:14-cv-00452-MMD-VPC 10 11 12 Petitioner, ORDER v. ROBERT LeGRANDE, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 16 This action involves a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by a Nevada state prisoner represented by counsel. 17 On December 8, 2014, this Court granted petitioner’s motion for counsel and 18 appointed the Federal Public Defender to represent petitioner in this action. (Dkt. no. 3.) 19 On January 7, 2015, Melanie Gavisk of the Federal Public Defender’s Office appeared 20 on behalf of petitioner. (Dkt. no. 5.) The Court now sets a schedule for further 21 proceedings in this action. 22 It is therefore ordered that counsel for petitioner shall meet with petitioner as 23 soon as reasonably possible, if counsel has not already done so, to: (a) review the 24 procedures applicable in cases under 28 U.S.C. § 2254; (b) discuss and explore with 25 petitioner, as fully as possible, the potential grounds for habeas corpus relief in 26 petitioner’s case; and (c) advise petitioner that all possible grounds for habeas corpus 27 relief must be raised at this time in this action and that the failure to do so will likely 28 result in any omitted grounds being barred from future review. 1 It is further ordered, so that respondents may be electronically served with the 2 amended petition and any exhibits or documents filed through counsel, that the Clerk of 3 Court shall serve respondents with a copy of this order. Respondents’ counsel shall 4 enter a notice of appearance herein within twenty (20) days of entry of this order. 5 It is further ordered that petitioner shall have ninety (90) days from the date of 6 entry of this order, to file and serve on respondents an amended petition for writ of 7 habeas corpus, which shall include all known grounds for relief (both exhausted and 8 unexhausted). 9 It is further ordered that respondents shall have thirty (30) days after service of 10 an amended petition within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, the amended 11 petition. If petitioner does not file an amended petition, respondents shall have thirty 12 (30) days from the date on which the amended petition is due within which to answer, or 13 otherwise respond to, petitioner’s original petition. 14 15 It is further ordered that if and when respondents file an answer, petitioner shall have thirty (30) days after service of the answer to file and serve a reply. 16 It is further ordered that any state court record exhibits filed by the parties herein 17 shall be filed with an index of exhibits identifying the exhibits by number or letter. The 18 CM/ECF attachments that are filed shall further be identified by the number or numbers 19 (or letter or letters) of the exhibits in the attachment. 20 It is further ordered that the parties shall send courtesy (paper) copies of all 21 exhibits presented in support of the amended petition and the response to the amended 22 petition to the Reno Division of this Court. Courtesy copies shall be mailed to the Clerk 23 of Court, 400 S. Virginia St., Reno, NV, 89501, and directed to the attention of “Staff 24 Attorney” on the outside of the mailing address label. 25 DATED THIS 9th day of January 2015. 26 27 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?