Riger v. Hometown Mortgage, LLC. et al
Filing
43
ORDERED that # 41 Motion to stay discovery is GRANTED. The # 43 Proposed discovery plan and scheduling order is DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 1/7/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
MERLY CS RIGER,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
U.S. BANK, N.A.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_____________________________ )
PRESENT:
3:14-CV-0462-MMD (VPC)
MINUTES OF THE COURT
January 7, 2015
THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
LISA MANN
REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Defendant filed a motion to stay discovery (#41). No opposition was filed. Pursuant to
Local Rule 7-2(d), the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to
any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion. Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that defendant’s motion to stay discovery (#41) is GRANTED. The
proposed discovery plan and scheduling order (#42) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:
/s/
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?