Friedman v. Cox et al

Filing 6

ORDER denying 5 Motion to Stay. Fully complete IFP application or payment of filing fees due within 30 days. Plaintiff shall notify this Court within 30 days whether he intends to proceed with this case or seek voluntary dismissal. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/23/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9

KENNETH A. FRIEDMAN,

10

Case No. 3:14-cv-00465-MMD-VPC
Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
11
JAMES GREGG COX et al.,
12

Defendants.

13
14
15

I.

DISCUSSION

16

On September 10, 2014, this Court ordered Plaintiff, a prisoner in the custody of

17

the Nevada Department of Corrections (“NDOC”), to file a fully complete application to

18

proceed in forma pauperis or pay the full $400 filing fee for a civil action within thirty (30)

19

days of the date of that order. (Dkt. no. 3 at 2.)

20

On September 17, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion for stay and abeyance of filing the

21

action pending exhaustion. (Dkt. no. 5.) In the motion, Plaintiff asks that the Court not

22

officially file his complaint until he has paid all the required fees and has resolved

23

whether or not Defendants will permit him to exhaust all available interdepartmental

24

remedies or whether he has in fact satisfied exhaustion. (Id. at 1.) Plaintiff requests a

25

stay and abeyance for 150 days and states that he will eventually ask the Court to file

26

his complaint. (Id. at 3.) Plaintiff seeks an abeyance to avoid the hardship of dismissal

27

and the need to refile when he may have already satisfied his exhaustion obligation.

28

(Id.)

1

In McKinney v. Carey, 311 F.3d 1198 (9th Cir. 2002), the Ninth Circuit held that a

2

district court must dismiss an action involving prison conditions when the plaintiff does

3

not exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit but is in the process of doing

4

so when a motion to dismiss is filed. Id. at 1199.

5

In this case, the Court finds that, in accordance to Ninth Circuit law, the Court

6

must dismiss the case, without prejudice, if Plaintiff has not exhausted his administrative

7

remedies. As such, the Court denies the motion for a stay and abeyance. However, the

8

Court grants Plaintiff thirty (30) days from the date of this order to inform this Court

9

whether Plaintiff intends to: (a) proceed on this action ― despite his uncertainty about

10

whether he has exhausted his claims ― or (b) seek a voluntary dismissal of this case,

11

without prejudice, to resolve the exhaustion issues. If Plaintiff fails to notify the Court of

12

his chosen option, this case will proceed and Defendants may raise exhaustion in a

13

subsequent motion. If Plaintiff chooses to voluntarily dismiss this case, the Court will not

14

impose a filing fee for this case.

15

If Plaintiff intends to proceed with this action, the Court directs Plaintiff to comply

16

with this Court’s September 10, 2014, order directing Plaintiff to either file a fully

17

complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the full $400 filing fee for this

18

action. The Court directs Plaintiff to file a fully complete application to proceed in forma

19

pauperis or pay the full filing fee for this action within thirty (30) days of the date of this

20

order. If Plaintiff fails to file either an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the

21

full filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, the Court will dismiss this

22

action without prejudice.

23

II.

24
25

CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that the motion for stay and abeyance

(dkt. no. 5) is denied.

26

It is further ordered that within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff

27

shall either: (1) file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, on the

28

correct form with complete financial attachments in compliance with 28 U.S.C. §
2

1

1915(a); or (2) pay the full $400 fee for filing a civil action (which includes the $350 filing

2

fee and the $50 administrative fee).

3

It is further ordered that within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff

4

shall notify this Court about whether he intends to proceed with this case or seek a

5

voluntary dismissal.

6
7
8

It is further ordered that if Plaintiff does not timely comply with this order,
dismissal of this action may result.
DATED THIS 23rd day of September 2014.

9
10

MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3