Weinfeld et al v. Minor et al
Filing
65
ORDER granting 57 Motion to Dismiss. Clerk shall enter judgment and close case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/9/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
______________________________________
)
)
JOSEPH WEINFELD et al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
BILL L. MINOR et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
3:14-cv-00513-RCJ-WGC
ORDER
12
13
Sixteen individuals and Congregation Beth Joseph brought this shareholder derivative
14
action in the Eastern District of New York on behalf of Precious Minerals Mining & Refining
15
Corp. (“PMMR”) against PMMR President Bill Minor and PMMR Board Members John
16
Reynolds and Walter Marting. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
17
transferred the case to this District under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) as an alternative to a request to
18
dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue. The transferor court did not rule on
19
contemporaneous requests to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) for failure to
20
comply with Rules 8(a), 9(b), and 23.1(b). This Court dismissed the FAC under the latter rule
21
and Rule 11(a) because it was not verified or even signed by any attorney. Plaintiffs filed the
22
Second Amended Complaint, and Defendants have moved to dismiss it. Because Plaintiffs have
23
not timely responded within fourteen days of the October 2, 2015 motion to dismiss, see Local
24
R. 7-2(b), the Court grants the motion, see Local R. 7-2(d).
1 of 2
CONCLUSION
1
2
3
4
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 57) is GRANTED, and
the Clerk shall enter judgment and close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 9th day of November, 2015.
Dated this 20th day of October, 2015.
6
7
8
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?