FRYE v. Colvin
Filing
32
ORDER - Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees (ECF No. 28 ) is granted. The later filed motion for attorney's fees (ECF No. 30 ) is denied as moot. It is further ordered that the check to Plaintiff's counsel be sent to the address identified in the proposed order filed as ECF No. 28 -6. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/25/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
***
8
JASON FRYE,
9
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
10
11
Case No. 3:14-cv-00523-MMD-VPC
CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting Commissioner
of Social Security,
12
Defendant.
13
14
Plaintiff prevailed in this action seeking judicial review of the Commissioner’s denial
15
of his application for Social Security Disability Insurance benefits. (ECF No. 22.) The Court
16
granted his motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act
17
(“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, awarding attorney’s fees in the amount of $6,831.51 and costs
18
in the amount of $411.55, subject to offset allowed under the Treasury Offset Program.
19
(ECF No. 26 at 2.) Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for approval of attorney’s fees
20
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (“Motion”), requesting fees in the amount of $17,748.25.
21
(ECF Nos. 28, 30.1) The Commissioner responds to the Motion, but it declines to take a
22
position as to the reasonableness of the fees requested. (ECF No. 29.)
23
On October 9, 2014, Plaintiff filed his Complaint seeking judicial review of a final
24
denial of his application for disability benefits under the Social Security Act (“SSA”) (ECF
25
No. 1.) Plaintiff subsequently moved to remand (ECF No. 14) while the Commissioner
26
sought to affirm the administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) decision (ECF No. 15). After full
27
28
fees.
1The
second motion is essentially the same as the first filed motion for attorney’s
1
briefing on the parties’ competing motions, the Magistrate Judge recommended granting
2
Plaintiff’s request to remand, finding that the ALJ erred in failing to address certain medical
3
opinion and properly consider all the functional limitations contained in that opinion. (ECF
4
No. 20.) The Commissioner did not object. The Court subsequently adopted the Magistrate
5
Judge’s recommendation. (ECF No. 22.)
6
Following remand, the ALJ found Plaintiff disabled (ECF No. 28-3 at 17) and
7
awarded Plaintiff past-due benefits from June 2013 through June 2016 in the amount of
8
$70,993.00 and withheld $17,748.25 from the total past due benefits for purpose of
9
compensating Plaintiff’s representatives. (ECF No. 28-2 at 1-3.) The fee agreement
10
between Plaintiff and his counsel, John C. Boyden, provides for fee to counsel up to 25%
11
of the total back benefits awarded. (ECF No. 28-1.) Plaintiff also agreed that his counsel
12
may request additional fees and costs under the EAJA in the event of an appeal. (Id.) The
13
amount of fees requested here amounts to 25% of the total past benefits awarded.
14
As the Supreme Court has found, the statutory scheme established under the SSA
15
“deals with the administrative and judicial review stages discretely: § 406(a) governs fees
16
for representation in administrative proceedings; § 406(b) controls fees for representation
17
in court.” Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 794 (2002). Because the Motion seeks fees
18
in connection with Plaintiff’s representation in the case, the Court will address the Motion
19
under section 406(b).
20
Section 406(b)(1)(A) provides, in pertinent part, that “[w]henever a court renders a
21
judgment favorable to a claimant . . . the court may determine and allow as part of its
22
judgment a reasonable fee [to claimant’s counsel] for such representation, not in excess
23
of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by reason
24
of such judgment.” 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A). In Gisbrecht, the Supreme Court clarified
25
that courts must respect “the primacy of the lawful attorney-client fee agreements.”
26
Gisbrecht, 535 U.S. at 793. Where, as here, the claimant and her counsel have entered
27
into a contingency-fee agreement, courts must “review for reasonableness fees yielded
28
by those agreements.” Id. at 809. “Performance of that duty must begin, under Gisbrecht
2
1
with the fee agreement, and the question is whether the amount need be reduced, not
2
whether the loadstar amount should be enhanced.” Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142,
3
1149 (9th Cir. 2009). A district may reduce a fee resulting from a contingency-fee
4
agreement
5
representation or engaged in dilatory conduct in order to increase the accrued amount of
6
past-due benefits, or if the benefits are large in comparison to the amount of time counsel
7
spent on the case.” Id. at 1148 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted.) The attorney
8
requesting the fees bears the burden of establishing the reasonableness of the fees
9
sought. Id.
on
reasonableness ground
“if
the
attorney provided
substandard
10
The Court finds that Plaintiff’s counsel has satisfied his burden of establishing the
11
reasonableness of the fees requested here, considering counsel’s representation of
12
Plaintiff in the case before the Court, including the substantial amount of time devoted to
13
preparing the briefs relating to the motion to remand and opposing the cross motion to
14
affirm. Accordingly, the Court will grant the Motion.
15
16
17
18
It is therefore ordered that Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees (ECF No. 28) is
granted. The later filed motion for attorney’s fees (ECF No. 30) is denied as moot.
It is further ordered that the check to Plaintiff’s counsel be sent to the address
identified in the proposed order filed as ECF No. 28-6.
19
20
DATED THIS 25th day of October 2017.
21
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?