Fernandez v. Baker et al
ORDER denying 328 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 6/5/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DN)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
JAMES GREG COX, et al.,
June 5, 2017
THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is plaintiff’s motion to compel supplemental interrogatory responses
(ECF No. 328). Defendants opposed the motion (ECF No. 331), and plaintiff replied (ECF No.
334). Defendants’ objections to the interrogatories are sustained. Furthermore, the court finds
that plaintiff has not provided a basis for this court to compel further responses interrogatories.
Moreover, plaintiff has not shown that his requests for supplementation are relevant or
proportional to the needs of this case. Therefore, plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 328) is DENIED
in its entirety.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?