Manley v. Baker et al

Filing 25

ORDER granting 24 Motion to Extend Time re 23 Answer to 4 Petition. Petitioner's reply due within 90 days. Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court is highly unlikely to grant any further extensions. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/12/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9

CHARLES STEPHEN MANLEY,

10

Case No. 3:14-cv-00580-RCJ-VPC
Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
11
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
14

This pro se habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 comes before the court on

15

petitioner’s motion for extension of time to reply to respondents’ answer (ECF No. 24).

16

Good cause appearing,

17

IT IS ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for extension of time to file his reply in

18

support of his petition (ECF No. 24) is GRANTED. Petitioner shall file his reply within

19

ninety (90) days of the date of this order. Petitioner is advised that, absent

20

extraordinary circumstances, the court is highly unlikely to grant any further extensions.

21
22

DATED: This 12th day of April, 2016.
DATED: 11 April 2016.

23
24
ROBERT C. JONES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28
1