Trost v. Cox et al

Filing 177

ORDER granting ECF No. 176 Stipulation for extension of time to respond to ECF No. 166 Motion to Compel. Defendants' response due 12/8/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 12/1/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
Case 3:14-cv-00611-MMD-WGC Document 176 Filed 11/30/17 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ADAM PAUL LAXALT Nevada Attorney General ERIN L. ALBRIGHT #9953 Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada Bureau of Litigation Public Safety Division 100 No. Carson St. Carson City, NV 89701-4717 Tel: 775-684-1257 E-Mail: ealbright@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Defendants Romeo Aranas, Isidro Baca, Dwayne Baze, Robert Bannister, Barbara Cegavske, Travis Bennett, Stephen Daniels, James Dzurenda, Travis Fratis, Aaron Harroun, Daniel Henson, Christopher Jones, Adam Laxalt, Valaree Olivas, Brian Sandoval, Robert Schofield, Holly Skulstad, Ronald Waldo, Vernon White, and State of Nevada ex rel. Board of Prison Commissioners 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 ROY TROST aka DAISY MEADOWS, 15 Case No. 3:14-cv-00611-MMD-WGC Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ENLARGE THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION AND FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS (ECF NO. 166) (SECOND REQUEST) STATE OF NEVADA, et al., 18 Defendants. 19 Defendants, Romeo Aranas, Isidro Baca, Dwayne Baze, Robert Bannister, Barbara Cegavske, 20 Travis Bennett, Stephen Daniels, James Dzurenda, Travis Fratis, Aaron Harroun, Daniel Henson, 21 Christopher Jones, Adam Laxalt, Valaree Olivas, Brian Sandoval, Robert Schofield, Holly Skulstad, 22 Ronald Waldo, Vernon White and State of Nevada ex rel. Board of Prison Commissioners (collectively, 23 the “Defendants”) by and through counsel, Adam Paul Laxalt, Nevada Attorney General, and Erin L. 24 Albright, Deputy Attorney General, and Plaintiff, Roy Trost aka Daisy Meadows, by and through 25 counsel, Margaret A. McLetchie, Esq., hereby stipulate to enlarge the time for Defendants to respond to 26 Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Production and For Attorney’s Fees and Costs 27 (ECF No. 166) to December 8, 2017. The extension is sought because the parties will be discussing the 28 motion to compel on November 30, 2017 in an attempt to resolve the outstanding discovery issues 1 Case 3:14-cv-00611-MMD-WGC Document 176 Filed 11/30/17 Page 2 of 3 1 presented in Plaintiff’s motion. Due to the fact that the parties are attempting to address the outstanding 2 discovery issues, the parties have agreed to further extend the date the time for Defendants to respond to 3 Plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 166). 4 DATED this 30th day of November 2017. DATED this 30th day of November 2017. MCLETCHIE SHELL LLC OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL By: /s/ Margaret A. McLetchie Margaret A. McLetchie, SBN 10931 701 E. Bridger Ave., Suite 520 Las Vegas, NV 89101 (702) 728-5300 maggie@nvlitigation.com Attorney for Plaintiff Roy Trost aka Daisy Meadows By: ___________________________ Erin L. Albright, SBN 9953 100 N. Carson Street Carson City, NV 89701 (775) 684-1257 ealbright@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Defendants 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ORDER 15 This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation to Extend the Time for 16 Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses and Requests for Production and for 17 Attorney’s Fees and Costs (ECF No. 166). The Court has examined the Stipulation as agreed by the 18 parties to this stipulation and good cause having been shown, 19 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants are granted until December 8, 2017 to respond 20 to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses and Requests for Production and for Attorney’s Fees and 21 Costs (ECF No. 166). 22 23 24 25 26 DATED this _____ day of _________________ 2017. DATED: December l, 2017. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?