Hall v. Baca et al

Filing 4

ORDER Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis 1 is granted. Clerk shall detach and file petition 1 -1 and motion for appointment of counsel 1 -2. Motion for appointment of counsel is granted. FPD appointe d to represent petitioner. Clerk shall electronically serve FPD copy of order with copy of petition (served via NEF 2/11/15). FPD shall have 30 days to file notice of appearance or indicate inability to represent petitioner. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/11/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 DAMIAN HALL, 11 Petitioner, Case No. 3:14-cv-00613-RCJ-WGC 12 vs. ORDER 13 MR. BACA, et al., 14 Respondents. 15 16 17 A Nevada prisoner, Damian Hall, has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis 18 (ECF #1) and a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF #1-1). 19 Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis shall be granted. 20 Petitioner has also submitted a motion for appointment of counsel (ECF #1-2). There is no 21 constitutional right to appointed counsel for a federal habeas corpus proceeding. Pennsylvania v. 22 Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987); Bonin v. Vasquez, 999 F.2d 425, 428 (9th Cir. 1993). The decision 23 to appoint counsel is generally discretionary. Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986), 24 cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1023 (1987); Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1234 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 25 U.S. 838 (1984). However, counsel must be appointed if the complexities of the case are such that 26 denial of counsel would amount to a denial of due process, and where the petitioner is a person of such 27 limited education as to be incapable of fairly presenting his claims. See Chaney, 801 F.2d at 1196; see 28 also Hawkins v. Bennett, 423 F.2d 948 (8th Cir. 1970). Here, the manner in which petitioner has 1 attempted to complete the form petition suggests that he does not comprehend what information he is 2 required to supply (see, e.g., ECF #1-1, p. 3 - under Ground 1 petitioner has listed the counts to which 3 he pleaded guilty, with no other information). Additionally, petitioner has alleged that he suffers from 4 mental illness and has included a medical kite that reflects that he takes several medications for his 5 schizophrenia (ECF #3). Finally, petitioner appears to be serving a term of ten years to life, with a 6 consecutive term of eight to twenty years, and a consecutive term of four to ten years. Accordingly, 7 petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel is granted. 8 9 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF # 1) is GRANTED. 10 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk DETACH and FILE the petition (ECF #1-1). 11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk DETACH and FILE petitioner’s motion for 12 13 14 15 16 appointment of counsel (ECF #1-2). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF #1-2) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada (“FPD”) is appointed to represent petitioner. 17 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the FPD 18 a copy of this order, together with a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF #1-1). The FPD 19 shall have thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order to file a notice of appearance or to indicate 20 to the court its inability to represent petitioner in these proceedings. 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, after counsel has appeared for petitioner in this case, the 22 court will issue a scheduling order, which will, among other things, set a deadline for the filing of a first 23 amended petition. 24 DATED: This 11th day ofof February, 2015. Dated this ______ day February, 2015 25 ___________________________________ 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?