Gill v. Baca et al

Filing 68

ORDER that ECF Nos. 66 Motion to Stay Case and 67 Motion to Dismiss are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/3/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9

KEVIN ROHN GILL,

Case No. 3:14-cv-00628-MMD-WGC
Petitioner,

10

ORDER

v.
11
ISIDRO BACA, et al.,
12
Respondents.
13
14

The Court previously denied Petitioner’s motion to stay case, granted Petitioner’s

15

motion to dismiss, and entered final judgment. (ECF Nos. 64, 65.) Petitioner has filed

16

another motion for stay and abeyance (ECF No. 66) and motion to dismiss (ECF No. 67).1

17

The motions are moot because the Court already has dismissed the action. However,

18

Petitioner has opened another action, Gill v. Baca, 3:18-cv-00180-MMD-CBC (“Gill II”).

19

Petitioner might have intended to file these motions in Gill II, but he put the case number

20

of this action on the front. The Court will deny the motions in this action. In a separate

21

order filed in Gill II, the Court will give Petitioner the opportunity to file the motions in Gill

22

II, along with a habeas corpus petition that is on the correct form.
It is therefore ordered that Petitioner’s motion for stay and abeyance (ECF No. 66)

23
24

is denied as moot.
It is further ordered that Petitioner’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 67) is likewise

25
26

denied as moot.

27

///

28

1The

two motions are on the same document but are docketed separately.

1

DATED THIS 3rd day of October 2018.

2
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2