Strohmeyer v. Belanger et al

Filing 186

ORDER re ECF No. 153 Order, clarifying that the conclusion should read that Plaintiff may proceed in Count IV with the First Amendment mail tampering claim against Jenkins and Bequette, and against the unidentified mailroom officers if substituted within the parameters of the operative scheduling order and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 8/23/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 JEREMY STROHMEYER, 4 Plaintiff 5 v. Case No.: 3:14-cv-00661-RCJ-WGC Order Re: ECF No. 153 6 K. BELANGER, et. al., 7 Defendants 8 9 It has come to the court's attention that a portion of the order screening Plaintiff's third 10 amended complaint requires some clarification. At ECF No. 153, p. 16:22-23 to p. 17:1-2, the 11 court ruled that in Count IV Plaintiff states a colorable mail tampering claim against Jenkins and 12 Bequette, and that he could also proceed against the unidentified mail room officers when he learns 13 their identities and substitutes them in conformity with the operative scheduling order and the 14 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Part of this ruling appears to have been omitted in the conclusion 15 of the order. (See ECF No. 153 at p. 25:13-15.) Therefore, the court issues this Order clarifying 16 that the conclusion should read that Plaintiff may proceed in Count IV with the First Amendment 17 mail tampering claim against Jenkins and Bequette, and against the unidentified mailroom officers 18 if substituted within the parameters of the operative scheduling order and Federal Rules of Civil 19 Procedure. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: August 23, 2019. 22 23 _________________________________ William G. Cobb United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?