Moe v. NNCC et al
Filing
7
ORDER denying 6 motion for reconsideration. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/30/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
NNCC et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
___________________________________ )
13
I.
7
8
9
10
11
MICHAEL JOHN MOE,
3:14-cv-689-RCJ-VPC
ORDER
DISCUSSION
14
On May 21, 2015, this Court entered a screening order dismissing the complaint in its
15
entirety without leave to amend. (ECF No. 3 at 8). Specifically, the Court found that Plaintiff
16
failed to state a retaliation claim and due process claim.
17
motion for reconsideration. (ECF No. 6).
(Id. at 4-7). Plaintiff now files a
18
A motion to reconsider must set forth “some valid reason why the court should
19
reconsider its prior decision” and set “forth facts or law of a strongly convincing nature to
20
persuade the court to reverse its prior decision.” Frasure v. United States, 256 F.Supp.2d
21
1180, 1183 (D. Nev. 2003). Reconsideration is appropriate if this Court “(1) is presented with
22
newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly
23
unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law.” Sch. Dist. No. 1J v. Acands,
24
Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993). “A motion for reconsideration is not an avenue to
25
re-litigate the same issues and arguments upon which the court already has ruled.” Brown v.
26
Kinross Gold, U.S.A., 378 F.Supp.2d 1280, 1288 (D. Nev. 2005).
27
28
The Court denies Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration. The Court does not find that
it committed clear error in its original decision.
1
2
3
II.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration (ECF
No. 6) is denied.
4
5
Dated this 30th day of June,June, 2015.
DATED: This _____ day of 2015.
6
7
_________________________________
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?