Krieger v. Baca et al
Filing
18
ORDERED that the respondents' # 13 Motion for clarification is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 2/4/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
***
12
13
14
MATTHEW KRIEGER,
Case No. 3:15-cv-00003-HDM-VPC
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
MR. BACA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
This pro se habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 comes before the court on
respondents’ motion for clarification (ECF No. 13).
IT IS ORDERED that respondents’ motion for clarification (ECF No. 13) is
GRANTED nunc pro tunc.
DATED: 4 February 2016.
22
HOWARD D. MCKIBBEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?