Krieger v. Baca et al

Filing 18

ORDERED that the respondents' # 13 Motion for clarification is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 2/4/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 *** 12 13 14 MATTHEW KRIEGER, Case No. 3:15-cv-00003-HDM-VPC Plaintiff, ORDER v. MR. BACA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 This pro se habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 comes before the court on respondents’ motion for clarification (ECF No. 13). IT IS ORDERED that respondents’ motion for clarification (ECF No. 13) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. DATED: 4 February 2016. 22 HOWARD D. MCKIBBEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?