Smith v. Cox et al
Filing
56
ORDER that Respondents' first and second motions for extension of time (ECF Nos. 52 , 54 ) are both granted nunc pro tunc. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/15/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
LARRY SMITH,
10
Case No. 3:15-cv-00034-MMD-VPC
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
11
JAMES COX, et al.,
12
Respondents.
13
14
Petitioner Larry Smith’s pro se habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 comes
15
before the Court on two motions for extension of time to answer the petition (ECF Nos.
16
52, 54). Good cause appearing, it is ordered that Respondent’s first and second motions
17
for extension of time (ECF Nos. 52, 54) are both granted nunc pro tunc.
18
DATED THIS 15th day of August 2018.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?