Contreras v. State of Nevada et al
Filing
5
ORDER Clerk shall file petition and motion for appointment of counsel. Motion for appointment of counsel is denied. Clerk shall add AG as counsel for respondents, shall electronically serve copy of petition and order on respondents, an d return to petitioner copy of petition (all documents served via NEF or USPS on 6/15/15). Respondents shall have 45 days to answer or otherwise respond. Hard copy of state court record exhibits shall be forwarded to staff attorneys in Las Vegas. Please see attached for further details and deadlines. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/12/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
ANTONIO PIMENTEL CONTRERAS,
10
Petitioner,
11
vs.
12
STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
13
Case No. 3:15-cv-00061-LRH-VPC
Respondents.
ORDER
14
15
Petitioner has paid the filing fee. The court has reviewed the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of
16
the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. The court will serve
17
the petition upon respondents for a response.
18
Petitioner has submitted a motion for appointment of counsel. Whenever the court
19
determines that the interests of justice so require, counsel may be appointed to any financially
20
eligible person who is seeking habeas corpus relief. 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). “[T]he district
21
court must evaluate the likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the petitioner to
22
articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved.” Weygandt v.
23
Look, 718 F.2d 952 (9th Cir. 1983). There is no constitutional right to counsel in federal habeas
24
proceedings. McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467, 495 (1991). The factors to consider are not
25
separate from the underlying claims, but are intrinsically enmeshed with them. Weygandt, 718 F.2d
26
at 954. After reviewing the petition, the court determines that appointment of counsel is not
27
warranted.
28
///
1
2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall file the petition for a writ of
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and the motion for appointment of counsel.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall add Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General
5
for the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents.
6
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall electronically serve upon respondents a
7
copy of the petition and this order. In addition, the clerk shall return to petitioner a copy of the
8
petition.
9
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from the date
10
on which the petition was served to answer or otherwise respond to the petition. Respondents shall
11
raise all potential affirmative defenses in the initial responsive pleading, including lack of
12
exhaustion and procedural default. Successive motions to dismiss will not be entertained. If
13
respondents file and serve an answer, then they shall comply with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing
14
Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and then petitioner shall have forty-five
15
(45) days from the date on which the answer is served to file a reply.
16
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any exhibits filed by the parties shall be filed with a
17
separate index of exhibits identifying the exhibits by number or letter. The CM/ECF attachments
18
that are filed further shall be identified by the number or numbers (or letter or letters) of the exhibits
19
in the attachment. The hard copy of any additional state court record exhibits shall be
20
forwarded—for this case—to the staff attorneys in Las Vegas.
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
-2-
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that henceforth, petitioner shall serve upon respondents or, if
2
appearance has been entered by counsel, upon the attorney(s), a copy of every pleading, motion or
3
other document submitted for consideration by the court. Petitioner shall include with the original
4
paper submitted for filing a certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of the document
5
was mailed to the respondents or counsel for the respondents. The court may disregard any paper
6
received by a district judge or magistrate judge that has not been filed with the clerk, and any paper
7
received by a district judge, magistrate judge, or the clerk that fails to include a certificate of service.
8
DATED this 12th day of June, 2015.
9
10
_________________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?