Marcelli v. Baca et al

Filing 8

ORDER striking 7 Addendum as an improper filing. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/1/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
9
10

ANTHONY MICHAEL MARCELLI,
11
Petitioner,

Case No. 3:15-cv-00063-RCJ-WGC

12
vs.

ORDER

13
ISIDRO BACA, et al.,
14
Respondents.
15
16
17
Petitioner submitted a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254,
18
which the court screened and directed be filed and served on respondents (ECF #s 5, 6). Now before
19
the court is petitioner’s addendum to his petition, filed on Mary 22, 2015 (ECF #7).
20
The court has reviewed petitioner’s purported addendum. He states, without elaboration, that
21
he wants to “add language” from–apparently–a Georgetown Law Journal discussion of vindictive
22
prosecution and selective prosecution to his petition (ECF #7, p. 1). The focus of petitioner’s filing is
23
that he seeks to “prepare” this court for the State of Nevada’s attempts to impede, obstruct, influence,
24
falsify information, and otherwise mislead this court. Id. at 2-3. Petitioner’s filing does not add any
25
claims cognizable in federal habeas corpus, nor add any facts or constitutional principles to any claims
26
that he has set forth in his petition. Accordingly, petitioner’s purported addendum shall be stricken as
27
an improper filing.
28

1
2

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner’s “addendum” (ECF #7) shall be STRICKEN
as an improper filing.

3
4
5

Dated this 1st day of of May, 2015.
Dated, this ___ day June, 2015.
___________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-