Reberger v. Byrne et al

Filing 7

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Motion for voluntary dismissal 6 is granted. This action dismissed without prejudice. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/6/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 *** 10 LANCE REBERGER, 11 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 12 13 Case No. 3:15-cv-00064-MMD-VPC MICHAEL BYRNE, et al., Defendants. 14 15 16 I. DISCUSSION 17 Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner, previously filed an application to proceed in forma 18 pauperis and a motion for temporary restraining order and permanent injunction. (Dkt. 19 no. 1, 1-1.) This Court denied the application to proceed in forma pauperis because 20 Plaintiff had three strikes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and denied the motion for 21 temporary restraining order and permanent injunction. (Dkt. no. 3 at 2, 5.) 22 Plaintiff now files a motion for voluntary dismissal. (Dkt. no. 6.) Pursuant to 23 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a 24 court order by filing “a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an 25 answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Court 26 grants Plaintiff’s motion to voluntarily dismiss this action because no responsive 27 pleading has been filed in this case. As such, the Court dismisses this action without 28 prejudice. 1 2 3 II. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that the motion for voluntary dismissal (dkt. no. 6) is granted. 4 It is further ordered that this action is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. 5 It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. 6 DATED THIS 6th day of March 2015. 7 8 9 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?