Manley v. Baker et al
Filing
6
ORDER granting 1 IFP application; denying without prejudice 4 Motion for Appointment of Counsel; denying 5 Motion for Leave to Conduct Discovery; directing Clerk to file and e-serve 1 -1 petition; directing Petition er within 30 days to show cause that petition is timely, and allowing 30 days for Respondents to respond. Any exhibits shall be filed with separate index. Hard copies of any exhibits shall be forwarded to the staff attorneys in Reno. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 10/28/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
8
CHARLES MANLEY,
9
Petitioner,
10
vs.
11
Case No. 3:15-cv-00083-LRH-WGC
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
12
ORDER
Respondents.
13
14
15
This action is a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254
by a Nevada state prisoner.
16
Petitioner has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 1). The
17
application establishes that the petitioner qualifies for in forma pauperis status. Petitioner shall be
18
granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and shall not be required to pay the filing fee for his
19
habeas corpus petition. The petition will be ordered filed.
20
Petitioner challenges a 2004 criminal conviction in the Eighth Judicial District Court of
21
Clark County, Nevada. The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) imposes a
22
one-year statute of limitations on the filing of federal habeas corpus petitions. 28 U.S.C. §
23
2244(d)(1). According to the attachments to the petition, petitioner’s judgment of conviction in the
24
Eighth Judicial District Case No. C204662 was filed on December 26, 2004. Petitioner signed his
25
federal habeas petition and dispatched it for mailing on January 25, 2015. It appears likely that the
26
petition was filed outside the AEDPA one-year limitations period, and may be subject to dismissal
27
on that basis. Petitioner will be granted an opportunity to demonstrate either that he submitted his
28
federal habeas corpus petition in a timely manner, or that he is excused from compliance with the
1
one-year limitations period imposed by the AEDPA. Respondents will be granted an opportunity to
2
file a response to petitioner’s proof.
3
4
5
6
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis
(ECF No. 1) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk SHALL FILE and ELECTRONICALLY
SERVE the petition (ECF No. 1-1) upon the respondents.
7
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date of
8
entry of this order to show cause and file such proof he may have to demonstrate that he submitted
9
his federal habeas corpus petition in a timely manner, or that he is excused from compliance with
10
11
the one-year limitations period imposed by the AEDPA.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner files such proof, respondents shall have
12
thirty (30) days to file a response to petitioner’s proof, including all portions of the state court
13
record that are relevant to the issue of whether the federal petition is timely.
14
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any state court record exhibits filed by respondents shall
15
be filed with a separate index of exhibits identifying the exhibits by number or letter. The hard copy
16
of all state court record exhibits shall be forwarded, for this case, to the staff attorneys in the Reno
17
Division of the Clerk of Court.
18
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner is unable to demonstrate that he submitted
19
his federal habeas corpus petition in a timely manner, or that he is excused from compliance with
20
the one-year limitations period imposed by the AEDPA, the Court will enter an order dismissing the
21
petition.
22
23
24
25
26
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for the appointment of counsel
(ECF No. 4) is DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for leave to conduct discovery (ECF
No. 5) is DENIED.
DATED this 28th day of October, 2015.
27
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?